South Sudan Now A New Country

South Sudan Now A New Country


So, as I was drinking my coffee and combing through my Facebook feed this morning (because I just don’t get the Google+ thing), I stumbled across this article and found it most interesting:

South Sudan has become the world’s newest nation, the climax of a process made possible by the 2005 peace deal that ended a long and bloody civil war.

Sudan’s President Omar al-Bashir and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon are among international dignitaries attending celebrations in the capital, Juba.

Sudan earlier became the first state to officially recognise its new neighbour.

The south’s independence follows decades of conflict with the north in which some 1.5 million people died.

Celebrations in Juba began at midnight (2100 GMT). A countdown clock in the city centre reached zero and the new national anthem was played on television.

South Sudan became the 193rd country recognised by the UN and the 54th UN member state in Africa.

However, despite all of the celebration, the new nation has some heavy challenges ahead:

The new country is rich in oil, but one of the least developed countries in the world, where one in seven children dies before the age of five.

Unresolved disputes between the north and south, particularly over the new border, have also raised the possibility of renewed conflict.

Still, independence rarely comes easily.

Now, call me crazy, but this seems like the type of news that I should have seen on the teevee or heard on the radio — not found haphazardly via a friend on Facebook.

Given our own nation’s tumultuous start in 1776, followed by a bloody war for independence against our colonial parent country, I would think that the story of South Sudan might have gotten a bit more attention in American media.

Then again, this was no Casey Anthony trial.

  • Terry

    I heard it on the radio, read about it in the NYT and the Guardian and on a number of blogs. It was rather everywhere really. What were you doing yesterday?

  • The Pajama Pundit

    @Terry: I was … around. Admittedly, it was a beautiful day here in central Pennsyltucky, so I spent some time outdoors. BUT, I still didn’t catch a whiff of the news until this morning.

    …and I should also add that I don’t read the New York Times.

  • WHQ

    Well, when you mention not seeing or hearing anything about a particular story on TV or the radio, mentions of the Guardian, the NYT and blogs miss the mark. So Terry did hear about South Sudan on the radio and The Pajama Pundit didn’t. It happens. But you really can’t avoid Casey Anthony without unusual effort. The relativity in coverage in broadcast media between stories seems a bit … off, here in the US (not where the Guardian is produced, also too).