<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 steps to improving the performance of your computer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2006/11/27/5-steps-to-improving-the-performance-of-your-computer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2006/11/27/5-steps-to-improving-the-performance-of-your-computer/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2006/11/27/5-steps-to-improving-the-performance-of-your-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-281064</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 21:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2006/11/27/5-steps-to-improving-the-performance-of-your-computer/#comment-281064</guid>
		<description>Anyone who is using any Norton products are so far behind the curve that I hope that there plot is paid for.

Having seen it hose one system when checking the file tables was enough, I will run for the door and refuse to be of any assistance to anyone using any of there products. They have problems even when it comes deleting infected emails, so how low can they go ?

And while you are it thinking that using just one product for scanning for adware is just plain silly as they do not catch all known threats, my advise is to use a mix of at least three different ones just to help catch the overlap.


Have fun or get hurt bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who is using any Norton products are so far behind the curve that I hope that there plot is paid for.</p>
<p>Having seen it hose one system when checking the file tables was enough, I will run for the door and refuse to be of any assistance to anyone using any of there products. They have problems even when it comes deleting infected emails, so how low can they go ?</p>
<p>And while you are it thinking that using just one product for scanning for adware is just plain silly as they do not catch all known threats, my advise is to use a mix of at least three different ones just to help catch the overlap.</p>
<p>Have fun or get hurt bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Jersey Computer Repair - Computer Clue</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2006/11/27/5-steps-to-improving-the-performance-of-your-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-181825</link>
		<dc:creator>New Jersey Computer Repair - Computer Clue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 04:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2006/11/27/5-steps-to-improving-the-performance-of-your-computer/#comment-181825</guid>
		<description>Jason is right, Norton slows computers down like crazy. Post was written in 2006, back then Norton applications were not that fat and slow... but still, NOD32 is the asnwer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason is right, Norton slows computers down like crazy. Post was written in 2006, back then Norton applications were not that fat and slow&#8230; but still, NOD32 is the asnwer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2006/11/27/5-steps-to-improving-the-performance-of-your-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-63033</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 18:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2006/11/27/5-steps-to-improving-the-performance-of-your-computer/#comment-63033</guid>
		<description>What Norton doesn&#039;t slow down your computer? Did symantec pay you to write that????  Norton is bloated and slow, burys itself deep within the OS making it very difficult it uninstall. Bitdefender Total, Kaspersky, Eset Smart Security(Nod32 w firewall/adware scanner) are all MUCH better choices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Norton doesn&#8217;t slow down your computer? Did symantec pay you to write that????  Norton is bloated and slow, burys itself deep within the OS making it very difficult it uninstall. Bitdefender Total, Kaspersky, Eset Smart Security(Nod32 w firewall/adware scanner) are all MUCH better choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

