<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Business gets Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2006/11/30/business-gets-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2006/11/30/business-gets-vista/</link>
	<description>Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2006/11/30/business-gets-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-161268</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 05:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2006/11/30/business-gets-vista/#comment-161268</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s more than two years since this post was published, so it&#039;s time for a retrospective.

&quot;The company expects that more 200 million people will use Vista by the end of next year.&quot;

They were a little bit out on that one, weren&#039;t they?

“This is the biggest launch in our company’s history. That’s for sure,” said Steve Ballmer, Chief Executive of Microsoft.&quot;

Yes, for sure - it was a *huge* launch.  I&#039;ll bet they thought that even God couldn&#039;t sink this operating system.

&quot;These are game-changing products [...]&quot;

Vista has certainly been a &quot;game changer&quot; - it&#039;s brought Microsoft to the end game, and business doesn&#039;t look so good for them now.

&quot;According to Ballmer, the new versions of Windows, Office and Exchange Server 2007 are the result of an unprecedented collaboration between Microsoft and its customers.&quot;

Which makes it all the more surprising that Vista was such a disaster (or maybe Mr Ballmer was lying?).

&quot;Vista [is] a lot prettier than Windows XP.&quot;

And the customers went for that in a big way, didn&#039;t they?

&quot;Predictably, Microsoft also says that Vista offers more reliable and more secure than previous version of Win[d]ows [...]&quot;

And, just as predictably, it wasn&#039;t true.

&quot;Research firm IDC predicts that Vista will be installed on more than 90 million computer worldwide by the end of 2007.&quot;

Did IDC migrate to Vista?  If so, I wonder how much they liked it.

&quot;Microsoft will back the launch of Vista with a marketing campaign costing hundreds of millions of dollars.&quot;

Microsoft certainly know how to spend money.  It&#039;s a shame they don&#039;t know how to spend it wisely.

&quot;A number of different versions of Vista will be released for consumers, ranging from the a basic version at US$199 all the way to an ultimate version at $399.&quot;

Ah, yes - as it turned out, you could buy cheap crap, middling price crap, or expensive crap.  (Did Microsoft ever come good on the promises regarding &quot;Ultimate extras&quot;, or have they forgotten about that now that Vista is being quietly swept under the carpet?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s more than two years since this post was published, so it&#8217;s time for a retrospective.</p>
<p>&#8220;The company expects that more 200 million people will use Vista by the end of next year.&#8221;</p>
<p>They were a little bit out on that one, weren&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>“This is the biggest launch in our company’s history. That’s for sure,” said Steve Ballmer, Chief Executive of Microsoft.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, for sure &#8211; it was a *huge* launch.  I&#8217;ll bet they thought that even God couldn&#8217;t sink this operating system.</p>
<p>&#8220;These are game-changing products [...]&#8221;</p>
<p>Vista has certainly been a &#8220;game changer&#8221; &#8211; it&#8217;s brought Microsoft to the end game, and business doesn&#8217;t look so good for them now.</p>
<p>&#8220;According to Ballmer, the new versions of Windows, Office and Exchange Server 2007 are the result of an unprecedented collaboration between Microsoft and its customers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which makes it all the more surprising that Vista was such a disaster (or maybe Mr Ballmer was lying?).</p>
<p>&#8220;Vista [is] a lot prettier than Windows XP.&#8221;</p>
<p>And the customers went for that in a big way, didn&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>&#8220;Predictably, Microsoft also says that Vista offers more reliable and more secure than previous version of Win[d]ows [...]&#8221;</p>
<p>And, just as predictably, it wasn&#8217;t true.</p>
<p>&#8220;Research firm IDC predicts that Vista will be installed on more than 90 million computer worldwide by the end of 2007.&#8221;</p>
<p>Did IDC migrate to Vista?  If so, I wonder how much they liked it.</p>
<p>&#8220;Microsoft will back the launch of Vista with a marketing campaign costing hundreds of millions of dollars.&#8221;</p>
<p>Microsoft certainly know how to spend money.  It&#8217;s a shame they don&#8217;t know how to spend it wisely.</p>
<p>&#8220;A number of different versions of Vista will be released for consumers, ranging from the a basic version at US$199 all the way to an ultimate version at $399.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, yes &#8211; as it turned out, you could buy cheap crap, middling price crap, or expensive crap.  (Did Microsoft ever come good on the promises regarding &#8220;Ultimate extras&#8221;, or have they forgotten about that now that Vista is being quietly swept under the carpet?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
