GM brings back the electric car
By Alex Zaharov-Reutt
At the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, GM are showing off a concept car called the Chevrolet Volt. It’s the successor to the EV-1, last seen in the movie ‘Who Killed the Electric Car’. So, Hooray! An electric car from a big manufacturer is coming back. But one caveat – it’s still a hybrid, and it’s not available until ‘the end of the decade’.
Can it really be true? A major car company, the one that ‘killed’ the electric car, is finally bringing one back. GM’s website has an interesting press release with all the details, but no doubt we’ll be reading much more about their new car in the days ahead as the Detroit Auto Show kicks off next week.
Using what GM term the ‘E-flex System’, or their ‘next-generation electric propulsion system’, they promise that the car could nearly eliminate trips to the gas/petrol station.
It’s been built into the concept sedan known as the Chevrolet Volt, a battery-powered, four-passenger electric vehicle that uses a gas engine to create additional electricity to extend its range. There’s plenty more, so do read on, but there is one major downside: the car won’t be available until ‘the end’ of the decade. Still, that’s just under 3 years away, so we won’t have too long to wait, although anyone paying high gas/petrol prices would probably like one these cars right away.
According to GM, they’ve learned a lot since they launched the EV-1 back in 1996. GM Vice Chairman Robert A. Lutz says that “The EV1 was the benchmark in battery technology and was a tremendous achievement. Even so, electric vehicles, in general, had limitations. They had limited range, limited room for passengers or luggage, couldn’t climb a hill or run the air conditioning without depleting the battery, and had no device to get you home when the battery’s charge ran low”.
So far, it sounds like a bunch of excuses for not continuing development of the EV-1. Nevertheless, Lutz presses on and says that “The Chevrolet Volt is a new type of electric vehicle. It addresses the range problem and has room for passengers and their stuff. You can climb a hill or turn on the air conditioning and not worry about it.”
According to the press release, the Volt can be fully charged by plugging it into a 110-volt outlet for approximately six hours a day. When the lithium-ion battery is fully charged, the Volt can deliver 40 city miles of pure electric vehicle range. When the battery is depleted, a 1L, three-cylinder turbocharged engine spins at a constant speed, or revolutions per minute (rpm), to create electricity and replenish the battery. According to Lutz, this increases the fuel economy and range.
So, the Volt is clearly not an all-electric car like the Tesla Roadster, http://www.telsamotors.com, a car that gets 250 miles per charge, costs less than 1c per mile, goes from 0 to 60mph in less than 4 seconds and has 90% fewer parts than a convention car (or hybrid) as it has no gas/petrol engine at all to deal with. The Tesla Roadster also fully recharges in around 3 hours.
But back to the Volt. According to Lutz, “If you lived within 30 miles from work (60 miles round trip) and charged your vehicle every night when you came home or during the day at work, you would get 150 miles per gallon. More than half of all Americans live within 20 miles of where they work (40 miles round trip). In that case, you might never burn a drop of gas during the life of the car.”
To show how ecologically sensitive and efficient GM are, they promise that the Chevrolet Volt can also run on E85, a fuel blend that is 85 percent ethanol and 15 percent gasoline (petrol). GM assure us that “Using E85, fuel economy of 150 mpg would translate into more than 525 miles per petroleum gallon”.
So what happens if you forget to charge your car when you get home at night? Read onto the next page to find out!
GM tell us that “In the event a driver forgets to charge the vehicle or goes on a vacation far away, the Volt would still get 50 mpg by using the engine to convert gasoline into electricity and extending its range up to 640 miles, more than double that of today’s conventional vehicles”.
It’s important to know what kind of battery technology GM are planning to use. GM’s press release says that a large lithium-ion battery is needed. Despite the fact that Tesla Motors already use lithium-ion battery technology, GM is practically insisting that the technology is not yet up to scratch. According to their press release, they say that “This type of electric car, which the technical community calls an “EV range-extender,” would require a battery pack that weighs nearly 400 pounds (181 kg). Some experts predict that such a battery – or a similar battery – could be production-ready by 2010 to 2012”.
Sadly, GM and other car companies are still fixated on the idea that hybrid engines are a good idea. This is probably because they sell all the replacement parts that you’ll eventually need in a complex gas engine, which would probably be even more complex and numerous in a hybrid engine.
To that end, we have to endure GM’s boast that they have hybrid technology covered. Jon Lauckner, GM vice president of Global Program Management, says that: “That’s why we are also showing a variant of the Chevrolet Volt with a hydrogen-powered fuel cell, instead of a gasoline engine EV range-extender. Or, you might have a diesel engine driving the generator to create electricity, using bio-diesel. Finally, an engine using 100-percent ethanol might be factored into the mix. The point is, all of these alternatives are possible with the E-Flex System.”
Of course, Telsa Motors have shown us all that the alternatives are simply unnecessary with a purely electric motor. Hybrids are a distraction, something to keep the gas loving public happy. But eventually the public will realize that a hybrid engine simply wasn’t a necessary step, especially as fast charging technology enables a car to be fully recharged in only a few minutes. Companies like Toshiba announced such a breakthrough last year, with production due to come online around the same time that GM are promising the Volt’s rubber will hit the road.
Larry Burns, GM vice president for research and development and strategic planning, clearly knows the damage that dirty gas engines have had on the world, yet he still wants to keep on making them, even though they now say that electric is their focus.
Burns says that “Whether your concern is energy security, global climate change, natural disasters, the high price of gas, the volatile pricing of a barrel of oil and the effect that unpredictability has on Wall Street – all of these issues point to a need for energy diversity. Today, there are more than 800 million cars and trucks in the world. In 15 years, that will grow to 1.1 billion vehicles. We can’t continue to be 98-percent dependent on oil to meet our transportation needs. Something has to give. We think the Chevrolet Volt helps bring about the diversity that is needed. If electricity met only 10 percent of the world’s transportation needs, the impact would be huge.”
Of course, the impact would be even more huge if we transitioned to fully electric cars instead of the half-way step of a hybrid vehicle.
Burns says that “The DNA of the automobile has not changed in more than 100 years. “Vehicles still operate in pretty much the same fashion as when Karl Benz introduced the ‘horseless carriage’ in 1886”.
Of course, this isn’t entirely true. Back in the early 1900’s, there were cars that ran on gas/petrol, steam and electricity. Gas won because it was cheap. How sad it is for the world that electric cars did not win the race 100 years ago – we’d be living in a very different world today.
But, thankfully, GM is finally putting electric cars firmly back at the top of their priorities, even as they continue flirting with the manufactured need for a hybrid engine. Burns says that “While mechanical propulsion will be with us for many decades to come, GM sees a market for various forms of electric vehicles, including fuel cells and electric vehicles using gas and diesel engines to extend the range. With our new E-flex concept, we can produce electricity from gasoline, ethanol, bio-diesel or hydrogen”.
He continues that “We can tailor the propulsion to meet the specific needs and infrastructure of a given market. For example, somebody in Brazil might use 100-percent ethanol (E100) to power an engine generator and battery. A customer in Shanghai might get hydrogen from the sun and create electricity in a fuel cell. Meanwhile, a customer in Sweden might use wood to create bio-diesel.”
All of that is good and well, but if Tesla Motors can make a powerful electric only car today, without need for any wood powered bio-diesel from the forests of Sweden, with engines dramatically less complicated than hybrid engines, most of these alternatives are just sweet sounding distractions that are simply not needed.
Want to know more? Visit GM’s website to read the entire press release and look out for plenty of news about the Volt in the week to come all over the Internet.
Related:





Stumble It!

January 11th, 2007
The absolute best way to delay a technology, (say plug-in hybrid technology), is for some huge auto company to announce they are going to do it (and then sit on it) – then venture capital for companies like Tesla dries up – then you forget about it…Call me cynical, but GM will need to do a lot more than talk about their technology to get my attention. After all, they are the same company that crushed the EV-1 and campaigned so hard to eliminate electric plug-in stations in Los Angeles and elsewhere, cretins.
February 11th, 2007
Even if GM releases the Volt I will give my money to a car company like Tesla first – I’m hoping they have a mid-size by then. I won’t buy any American car unless it’s all electric, and I won’t buy a GM because they had an obvious hand in killing electric cars in the 90s. The only way I’d buy a GM is if they release the Volt (for sale, not lease so they can take it back again) before anyone else has a similar offering. GM lost me and anyone I can influence as a future customer during my viewing of “Who Killed the electric car” – great movie.
July 27th, 2007
Again with the bashing.. You love 100% electric cars.. We Get It!! Stop ranting and bashing alternative methods like hybrids, and biofuels (like ethanol, biodiesel, and hydrogen), as well as compressed air (MDI). Just because you are head honcho around here does Not make what you say accurate. As I tried to say in the post you made about the Hydrogen BMW, you need to get the Facts straight before you speak. Granted everyone is entitled to their own opinion.. However if you’re trying to promote technology and getting away from gasoline and moving forward, you are contradicting yourself by bashing the alternatives and touting the electric as the ONLY answer.. Which it is NOT. It will take a combination of all the green/alternative energies and fuels to move us forward until the better of them rise over the rest and so on in stages as the generations progress until we can find one superior energy source for everything.. But touting one over all others when you pick and choose to see and/or hear only what you want to and then rant.. it puts you on the same page as these idiots who drive around in 2 mpg cars, trucks, and suvs… Grow up and start doing your homework on this stuff before you ramble and rant. Judging by the photos, most of you are too young to know what most of this stuff really is.. I get my info from scientists and people who know what they’re talking about.. not newspapers and third parties trying to make a buck.
August 2nd, 2007
What Tesla have done is very impressive and I have high hopes for their success, but comparing them with GM is not a fair apples-to-apples comparison.
GM leased about 800 EV1s during its product life. Electric car advocates insist GM could have leased (or better, sold) many more if they had sincerely tried. I’m sure that’s true. Maybe they could have sold 5,000, maybe even 8,000. The problem is, they couldn’t have sold 100,000 EV1s — especially at a time when gasoline was cheap and plentiful, and global warming was still a fringe issue. GM is not in the niche or boutique car-making business, the EV1 didn’t fit into their business plan.
Tesla are planning to make 800 Roadsters in the first year, and only about 1,000 per year after that. I’m sure they’ll have no problem finding buyers for all they can make, but from GM’s standpoint the numbers are ridiculous. When Tesla roll out the “White Star” sedan, then they’ll be aiming for 10,000 per year, which is a big step up, but it’s still penny ante stuff from GM’s viewpoint.
The Tesla Roadster is technically impressive and should be highly competitive in the niche market of exotic sports cars, but it’s not ready to meet the needs of the masses. It’s too expensive, too small, and the batteries are only good for five years. Tesla expect replacement costs to run about $12,000 per battery pack. Ferrari owners aren’t fazed by that sort of thing, but it just won’t work for Joe Sixpack. Joe needs a battery good for the life of his car.
GM feel that the general pubic — in mass numbers — won’t accept a car with limited range and the other limitations of an EV1 or a Tesla Roadster. The PHEV strategy of the Chevy Volt is their way to remove those limitations from the equation, and it’s not a bad plan. The stumbling block is that a PHEV actually flogs the battery much harder. Because the battery is smaller and the electric driving range is smaller, the battery gets cycled a lot more frequently, and therefore it tends to wear out faster. The Tesla battery is good for 100,000 miles. If you put the same technology into a Chevy Volt then it would be wearing out after only 20,000 miles. GM are looking for a 200,000 mile battery for the Volt, and they are quite correct in saying it’s not ready.
Batteries have been invented which will probably work (re: A123Systems and AltairNano), but they haven’t been fully tested for automotive applications and put into full mass production yet. I’m optimistic that they’ll be ready by 2010 for the Volt. Of course Tesla will also benefit as batteries are improved.
December 23rd, 2007
First:
Volt is not a hybrid. If you carried a generator in your trunk to charge your EV1, would that be a hybrid as well? The Volt is essentially this, but with the added ability to run the generator while driving.
Second:
I am going to join the group of people that will purchase the Volt only if GM can grace us with its presence prior to Tesla’s affordable sedan (or another company).
GM’s attitude of only doing what is necessary must die here!