<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Belgian press sues Yahoo!, Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2007/01/19/belgian-press-sues-yahoo-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/01/19/belgian-press-sues-yahoo-google/</link>
	<description>Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Powell</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/01/19/belgian-press-sues-yahoo-google/comment-page-1/#comment-3392</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/01/19/belgian-press-sues-yahoo-google/#comment-3392</guid>
		<description>Those are excellent points you make about Yahoo! Google and so on. In fact there are two parts of your note which struck a resonant chord with me. The first part is where you metioned &#039;greed&#039; which is, I think, very seriously the motivating factor. 
The second point, somewhat shames me. I had forgotten that you can, of course, hide your web site so that search engines disregard it. Indeed, with some stuff in China I do that automatically. 
Your points are well taken.
Gareth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are excellent points you make about Yahoo! Google and so on. In fact there are two parts of your note which struck a resonant chord with me. The first part is where you metioned &#8216;greed&#8217; which is, I think, very seriously the motivating factor.<br />
The second point, somewhat shames me. I had forgotten that you can, of course, hide your web site so that search engines disregard it. Indeed, with some stuff in China I do that automatically.<br />
Your points are well taken.<br />
Gareth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: umopapisdn</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/01/19/belgian-press-sues-yahoo-google/comment-page-1/#comment-3388</link>
		<dc:creator>umopapisdn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/01/19/belgian-press-sues-yahoo-google/#comment-3388</guid>
		<description>Sounds like good old fashioned ignorance and/or greed to me.  If the Belgian press doesn&#039;t know how the Internet works and doesn&#039;t want to follow the standards of using the Internet like everyone else, then they need to GET OFF the Internet.  Period.  Just because I can plug a phone in doesn&#039;t mean I can just start calling random people and giving verbal threats.  Just because I can drive a car doesn&#039;t mean I can just drive through parks and on the sidewalk.  There is an Internet standard that already exists for robots.  If you don&#039;t want a search engine to crawl your website, use the robots.txt file.  Period.  There are other search engines such as Altavista, Ask, and others.  There are also likely hundreds of other hown-grown search engines out there as well.  If you don&#039;t want these search engines to crawl your website, just place the properly formatted robots.txt file on your website and be done with it.  If a robot doesn&#039;t follow the rules, THEN sue.  By just suing the top 3 search engines because you don&#039;t feel like following the standards is either ignorance, greed, or both.  And if Yahoo is linking to archived articles that are supposed to be paid for, that&#039;s a lack of the press site&#039;s poor security mechanism, not a problem for Yahoo to sort out.  You can&#039;t just attempt to &quot;hide&quot; articles in some &quot;mystery folder&quot; and then expect users not to find them.  By installing a web server on my machine, putting files into a non-secured folder, then plugging this machine onto the Internet, and registering a domain name so that my machine can be easily found, *I* am responsible if someone ends up getting that file.  If I don&#039;t want anyone to access the content, I should just unplug the machine.  If I want only &quot;authorized&quot; users to access the content, I should implement a security mechanism.  If I only want real people, and not robots, to access my content, I should use the robots.txt file.  It&#039;s not rocket science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like good old fashioned ignorance and/or greed to me.  If the Belgian press doesn&#8217;t know how the Internet works and doesn&#8217;t want to follow the standards of using the Internet like everyone else, then they need to GET OFF the Internet.  Period.  Just because I can plug a phone in doesn&#8217;t mean I can just start calling random people and giving verbal threats.  Just because I can drive a car doesn&#8217;t mean I can just drive through parks and on the sidewalk.  There is an Internet standard that already exists for robots.  If you don&#8217;t want a search engine to crawl your website, use the robots.txt file.  Period.  There are other search engines such as Altavista, Ask, and others.  There are also likely hundreds of other hown-grown search engines out there as well.  If you don&#8217;t want these search engines to crawl your website, just place the properly formatted robots.txt file on your website and be done with it.  If a robot doesn&#8217;t follow the rules, THEN sue.  By just suing the top 3 search engines because you don&#8217;t feel like following the standards is either ignorance, greed, or both.  And if Yahoo is linking to archived articles that are supposed to be paid for, that&#8217;s a lack of the press site&#8217;s poor security mechanism, not a problem for Yahoo to sort out.  You can&#8217;t just attempt to &#8220;hide&#8221; articles in some &#8220;mystery folder&#8221; and then expect users not to find them.  By installing a web server on my machine, putting files into a non-secured folder, then plugging this machine onto the Internet, and registering a domain name so that my machine can be easily found, *I* am responsible if someone ends up getting that file.  If I don&#8217;t want anyone to access the content, I should just unplug the machine.  If I want only &#8220;authorized&#8221; users to access the content, I should implement a security mechanism.  If I only want real people, and not robots, to access my content, I should use the robots.txt file.  It&#8217;s not rocket science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
