<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s Vista anti-virus solution slammed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2007/02/06/microsofts-vista-anti-virus-solution-slammed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/02/06/microsofts-vista-anti-virus-solution-slammed/</link>
	<description>Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cameron B.</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/02/06/microsofts-vista-anti-virus-solution-slammed/comment-page-1/#comment-4410</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 08:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/02/06/microsofts-vista-anti-virus-solution-slammed/#comment-4410</guid>
		<description>Jeez, Charles. Could you be a little more defensive? Go upgrade already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez, Charles. Could you be a little more defensive? Go upgrade already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris S.</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/02/06/microsofts-vista-anti-virus-solution-slammed/comment-page-1/#comment-4387</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 05:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/02/06/microsofts-vista-anti-virus-solution-slammed/#comment-4387</guid>
		<description>No, Charles F., the beginning of article says &quot;Microsoft and three other security vendors ... McAfee’s VirusScan Enterprise, G DATA’s AntiVirusKit 2007, and Norman’s VirusControl&quot; failed.  The end says &quot;Anti-virus software from CA, Fortinet, F-Secure, Kaspersky, Sophos and Symantec successfully achieved VB100 certification.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Charles F., the beginning of article says &#8220;Microsoft and three other security vendors &#8230; McAfee’s VirusScan Enterprise, G DATA’s AntiVirusKit 2007, and Norman’s VirusControl&#8221; failed.  The end says &#8220;Anti-virus software from CA, Fortinet, F-Secure, Kaspersky, Sophos and Symantec successfully achieved VB100 certification.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles F.</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/02/06/microsofts-vista-anti-virus-solution-slammed/comment-page-1/#comment-4366</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/02/06/microsofts-vista-anti-virus-solution-slammed/#comment-4366</guid>
		<description>The beginning of this article states that they did not recieve certification. The end of the article says they did. Could you be a little more ambigious?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The beginning of this article states that they did not recieve certification. The end of the article says they did. Could you be a little more ambigious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Steele</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/02/06/microsofts-vista-anti-virus-solution-slammed/comment-page-1/#comment-4307</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 04:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/02/06/microsofts-vista-anti-virus-solution-slammed/#comment-4307</guid>
		<description>What a major Microsoft *Burn!*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a major Microsoft *Burn!*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
