<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Defender under fire for failing spyware test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2007/02/21/microsoft-defender-under-fire-for-failing-spyware-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/02/21/microsoft-defender-under-fire-for-failing-spyware-test/</link>
	<description>Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremyduffy</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/02/21/microsoft-defender-under-fire-for-failing-spyware-test/comment-page-1/#comment-17713</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremyduffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 12:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/02/21/microsoft-defender-under-fire-for-failing-spyware-test/#comment-17713</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used spyware doctor before, but I don&#039;t see much point to using it versus Adaware which is free and also works well.

Important to note: there&#039;s no reason why you can&#039;t use many spyware scanners on the same machine. They&#039;re not like firewalls and virus scanners which interfere with each other.

Also important to note, no anti-spyware company has been brave enough to tag known spyware in major software such as AOL or Windows Vista. It will be a banner day when they do...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used spyware doctor before, but I don&#8217;t see much point to using it versus Adaware which is free and also works well.</p>
<p>Important to note: there&#8217;s no reason why you can&#8217;t use many spyware scanners on the same machine. They&#8217;re not like firewalls and virus scanners which interfere with each other.</p>
<p>Also important to note, no anti-spyware company has been brave enough to tag known spyware in major software such as AOL or Windows Vista. It will be a banner day when they do&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Great-House</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/02/21/microsoft-defender-under-fire-for-failing-spyware-test/comment-page-1/#comment-5337</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Great-House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/02/21/microsoft-defender-under-fire-for-failing-spyware-test/#comment-5337</guid>
		<description>Windows Defender is better than no anti-spyware tool. I think they need to have another beta release. What&#039;s the news on Windows OneCare?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows Defender is better than no anti-spyware tool. I think they need to have another beta release. What&#8217;s the news on Windows OneCare?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rexx</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/02/21/microsoft-defender-under-fire-for-failing-spyware-test/comment-page-1/#comment-5290</link>
		<dc:creator>Rexx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/02/21/microsoft-defender-under-fire-for-failing-spyware-test/#comment-5290</guid>
		<description>Spyware Doctor price is not $US49.49, its $US29.95, and if it&#039;s going to catch 50% more spyware than the free Defender i would rather fork out this measley amount!  I just don&#039;t understand all these tight asses that demand free software - you certainly do get what you pay for in this case!
From a happy Spyware Dcotor customer.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spyware Doctor price is not $US49.49, its $US29.95, and if it&#8217;s going to catch 50% more spyware than the free Defender i would rather fork out this measley amount!  I just don&#8217;t understand all these tight asses that demand free software &#8211; you certainly do get what you pay for in this case!<br />
From a happy Spyware Dcotor customer&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
