<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FutureLink founders attack Microsoft over cover up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2007/02/23/futurelink-founders-attack-microsoft-over-cover-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/02/23/futurelink-founders-attack-microsoft-over-cover-up/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joey dee</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/02/23/futurelink-founders-attack-microsoft-over-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-170363</link>
		<dc:creator>joey dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/02/23/futurelink-founders-attack-microsoft-over-cover-up/#comment-170363</guid>
		<description>a little research into the plaintiffs sheds light on this... legal troubles abound...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a little research into the plaintiffs sheds light on this&#8230; legal troubles abound&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisdee</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/02/23/futurelink-founders-attack-microsoft-over-cover-up/comment-page-1/#comment-5465</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisdee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/02/23/futurelink-founders-attack-microsoft-over-cover-up/#comment-5465</guid>
		<description>Whats really interesting and perhaps may be a FIRST for Microsoft, is the fact  that they are asking the judge in this case to hide the  Microsoft name from the jury and the world.  The argument being that as soon as a jury hears the Microsoft name that the jury would be prejudiced against them at the onset.   Would,nt it be nice if we all could hide our name in a trial to save face...It looks like Microsoft now thinks it is powerful enough to rewrite law in the State Of California.   What is it about THIS case that they are so afraid of, that they would stoop so low? Why didn,t they try using that rediculous  tactict in the $1.52 billion dollar lawsuit that they lost against Alcatel-Lucent on Friday?   Only time will tell...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whats really interesting and perhaps may be a FIRST for Microsoft, is the fact  that they are asking the judge in this case to hide the  Microsoft name from the jury and the world.  The argument being that as soon as a jury hears the Microsoft name that the jury would be prejudiced against them at the onset.   Would,nt it be nice if we all could hide our name in a trial to save face&#8230;It looks like Microsoft now thinks it is powerful enough to rewrite law in the State Of California.   What is it about THIS case that they are so afraid of, that they would stoop so low? Why didn,t they try using that rediculous  tactict in the $1.52 billion dollar lawsuit that they lost against Alcatel-Lucent on Friday?   Only time will tell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

