Comments on: NTIA digital TV subsidy program worth $1.5 billion is unnecessary

By: Carroll B. Merriman

Carroll B. Merriman — Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:12:06 +0000

You must participate in a contest for probably the greatest blogs on the web. I will recommend this website!

By: steve laiken

steve laiken — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:02:29 +0000

i don’t believe switch to digital was necessary in the first place.
i do believe the switch to digital was a sellout of ‘we the people’ to the broadcast industry or tv manuf undustry by the bush cheney criminal organization.

By: Bob Lothrope

Bob Lothrope — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:32:53 +0000

I paid a lot less than $40 for my TV.

Since TV was invented, there has never been a compatibility break. When color TV came out, the government insisted that broadcasters continue to support black and white receivers. The same goes for phones and radios.

I shouldn’t have to replace or pay to upgrade my electronics on someone else’s schedule.

By: Dave Smith

Dave Smith — Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:43:25 +0000

Congress will be instrumental in subsidizing this? I’m glad I don’t have cable. In the years to come, I hope everyone remembers who was so concerned that the public was properly “programmed”.

Turn off your televisions. Write something. Draw a picture. Go outside and lay on the lawn. Take a picture with your camera. Go surfing. Breath some real air.