http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/03/26/citizendium-injects-professionalism-to-wikipedias-flaws/ Top Technology news Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:30:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/03/26/citizendium-injects-professionalism-to-wikipedias-flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-222210 Tim Bite Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:50:36 +0000 http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/03/26/citizendium-injects-professionalism-to-wikipedias-flaws/#comment-222210 Isn't Sager the guy who called people the "unwashed masses"? I think this guy is confusing schooling with intelligence! Isn’t Sager the guy who called people the “unwashed masses”? I think this guy is confusing schooling with intelligence!

]]> http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/03/26/citizendium-injects-professionalism-to-wikipedias-flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-7570 Triston McIntyre Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:32:06 +0000 http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/03/26/citizendium-injects-professionalism-to-wikipedias-flaws/#comment-7570 I would have to say I must disagree. Just as Facebook and MySpace exist and existed for a while, they tend to cater towards different audiences. Though facebook recently allowed non-collegiate networks to join (something that most collegiates are unhappy about), it still tends to exude a slightly more professional air than its direct competitor, MySpace. It might very well end up that Citizendium draws the academia and professional crowd, and Wikipedia keeps plugging along at the average citizen who isn't necessarily looking for a strong factual basis, just common knowledge articles. Agree to disagree :) I would have to say I must disagree. Just as Facebook and MySpace exist and existed for a while, they tend to cater towards different audiences. Though facebook recently allowed non-collegiate networks to join (something that most collegiates are unhappy about), it still tends to exude a slightly more professional air than its direct competitor, MySpace. It might very well end up that Citizendium draws the academia and professional crowd, and Wikipedia keeps plugging along at the average citizen who isn’t necessarily looking for a strong factual basis, just common knowledge articles. Agree to disagree :)

]]> http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/03/26/citizendium-injects-professionalism-to-wikipedias-flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-7569 Evorgleb Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:27:46 +0000 http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/03/26/citizendium-injects-professionalism-to-wikipedias-flaws/#comment-7569 We've been talking about Citizendium over at <a href="http://highbridnation.highbrid.com/?p=1489" rel="nofollow">Highbrid Nation</a>. Personally I use Wikipedia a lot and I don't see anything knocking it off its top spot. The features that make Citizendium better may just be the features that keep it from having the same sucess as Wikpedia. There can only be one. Who will it be? We’ve been talking about Citizendium over at Highbrid Nation. Personally I use Wikipedia a lot and I don’t see anything knocking it off its top spot. The features that make Citizendium better may just be the features that keep it from having the same sucess as Wikpedia. There can only be one. Who will it be?

]]>