Comments on: Steve Jobs unlikely to face criminal charges over options scandal http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/04/22/steve-jobs-unlikely-to-face-criminal-charges-over-options-scandal/ Top Technology news Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:30:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Chris Whalen http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/04/22/steve-jobs-unlikely-to-face-criminal-charges-over-options-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-9622 Chris Whalen Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:33:06 +0000 http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/04/22/steve-jobs-unlikely-to-face-criminal-charges-over-options-scandal/#comment-9622 This is hardly new news: “Despite Apple’s disclosure that Jobs approved widespread backdating at Apple, there is no evidence he directed the backdating of his own grant or covered it up afterward, based on a review of regulatory filings and interviews with lawyers intimately familiar with the grant who asked not to be identified,” wrote Mintz and Wolverton. The information in the public record, added to the no-name opinions of lawyers working for AAPL (?) does not add up to your headline. I still think that Job's must step down as a result of his errors and omissions. This is hardly new news: “Despite Apple’s disclosure that Jobs approved widespread backdating at Apple, there is no evidence he directed the backdating of his own grant or covered it up afterward, based on a review of regulatory filings and interviews with lawyers intimately familiar with the grant who asked not to be identified,” wrote Mintz and Wolverton.

The information in the public record, added to the no-name opinions of lawyers working for AAPL (?) does not add up to your headline. I still think that Job’s must step down as a result of his errors and omissions.

]]>