<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe says you will not Photoshop images</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2007/04/23/adobe-says-you-will-not-photoshop-images/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/04/23/adobe-says-you-will-not-photoshop-images/</link>
	<description>Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:44:01 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/04/23/adobe-says-you-will-not-photoshop-images/comment-page-1/#comment-10198</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 01:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/04/23/adobe-says-you-will-not-photoshop-images/#comment-10198</guid>
		<description>Nice article, do you mind if I xerox a few copies for my friends?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, do you mind if I xerox a few copies for my friends?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Schlaffer</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/04/23/adobe-says-you-will-not-photoshop-images/comment-page-1/#comment-10151</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Schlaffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 01:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/04/23/adobe-says-you-will-not-photoshop-images/#comment-10151</guid>
		<description>Fascinating...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phosphor</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/04/23/adobe-says-you-will-not-photoshop-images/comment-page-1/#comment-10150</link>
		<dc:creator>Phosphor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 00:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/04/23/adobe-says-you-will-not-photoshop-images/#comment-10150</guid>
		<description>Oops...I lied.

I typed &quot;Photoshop™&quot; 12 times in &lt;b&gt;20&lt;/b&gt; seconds.

My point stands, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops&#8230;I lied.</p>
<p>I typed &#8220;Photoshop™&#8221; 12 times in <b>20</b> seconds.</p>
<p>My point stands, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phosphor</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/04/23/adobe-says-you-will-not-photoshop-images/comment-page-1/#comment-10147</link>
		<dc:creator>Phosphor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 00:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/04/23/adobe-says-you-will-not-photoshop-images/#comment-10147</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt;&quot;it’s just too hard to add the copyright symbol in a post, it takes almost 10 seconds for each one so if I have to do it more than once, imagine the time I waste!&quot;

Hmm... Start stopwatch:
Photoshop™
Photoshop™
{Photoshop™
Photoshop™
Photoshop™
Photoshop™
Photoshop™
Photoshop™
Photoshop™&#039;
Photoshop™
P{hotoshop™
Photoshop™

I&#039;m a hunt-n-pecker. I just typed &quot;Photoshop™&quot; 12 times in ten seconds. I even left in the typos for extra authenticity!  ;•)

That&#039;s a Mac for ya. Just mere toys. Some of us have great fun playing on our toys, and are pretty danged efficient with them.

Seriously, though...I&#039;d be willing to bet a 21&quot; Cintiq that there&#039;s some not-unsignificant faction of Adobe Corporate &amp; Marketing that absolutely loves the fact that Photoshop has entered the international lexicon.
The public gerericization ofbrand names sure didn&#039;t seem to cause the bottom to drop out of business done by Bayer (aspirin™), Kimberley-Clark (Kleenex™), Otis Elevator (Escalator™), Johnson&amp;Johnson (Band-Aid™) or many other now-common, but trademark identities.

I understand Adobe&#039;s position as well, but trying to chastise and threaten casual users really is a whole lotta negative hoo-hah over what is probably a good thing for the brand&#039;s mindset saturation in the long term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;&#8221;it’s just too hard to add the copyright symbol in a post, it takes almost 10 seconds for each one so if I have to do it more than once, imagine the time I waste!&#8221;</p>
<p>Hmm&#8230; Start stopwatch:<br />
Photoshop™<br />
Photoshop™<br />
{Photoshop™<br />
Photoshop™<br />
Photoshop™<br />
Photoshop™<br />
Photoshop™<br />
Photoshop™<br />
Photoshop™&#8217;<br />
Photoshop™<br />
P{hotoshop™<br />
Photoshop™</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a hunt-n-pecker. I just typed &#8220;Photoshop™&#8221; 12 times in ten seconds. I even left in the typos for extra authenticity!  ;•)</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a Mac for ya. Just mere toys. Some of us have great fun playing on our toys, and are pretty danged efficient with them.</p>
<p>Seriously, though&#8230;I&#8217;d be willing to bet a 21&#8243; Cintiq that there&#8217;s some not-unsignificant faction of Adobe Corporate &amp; Marketing that absolutely loves the fact that Photoshop has entered the international lexicon.<br />
The public gerericization ofbrand names sure didn&#8217;t seem to cause the bottom to drop out of business done by Bayer (aspirin™), Kimberley-Clark (Kleenex™), Otis Elevator (Escalator™), Johnson&amp;Johnson (Band-Aid™) or many other now-common, but trademark identities.</p>
<p>I understand Adobe&#8217;s position as well, but trying to chastise and threaten casual users really is a whole lotta negative hoo-hah over what is probably a good thing for the brand&#8217;s mindset saturation in the long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Schlaffer</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/04/23/adobe-says-you-will-not-photoshop-images/comment-page-1/#comment-9532</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Schlaffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/04/23/adobe-says-you-will-not-photoshop-images/#comment-9532</guid>
		<description>Thanks for clearing that up, John.  I agree, Adobe has a right to defend it&#039;s rights and trademarks and their company logos.  But, even just suggesting the fact that you can&#039;t use the noun and verb variations of Photoshop seems silly.  I mean, no corporation could stop it, Google and in a different cirumstance Hormel with Spam.

I realize it may have just been legal positioning but if you ask me, it is kind of funny (though a somewhat serious matter).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clearing that up, John.  I agree, Adobe has a right to defend it&#8217;s rights and trademarks and their company logos.  But, even just suggesting the fact that you can&#8217;t use the noun and verb variations of Photoshop seems silly.  I mean, no corporation could stop it, Google and in a different cirumstance Hormel with Spam.</p>
<p>I realize it may have just been legal positioning but if you ask me, it is kind of funny (though a somewhat serious matter).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Nack</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/04/23/adobe-says-you-will-not-photoshop-images/comment-page-1/#comment-9530</link>
		<dc:creator>John Nack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/04/23/adobe-says-you-will-not-photoshop-images/#comment-9530</guid>
		<description>Hi Jonathan,

You can of course use whatever term you&#039;d like.  My understanding from the legal folks is that according to copyright law, they&#039;re obligated to mount a defense of the trademark.  That is, if we don&#039;t want to see &quot;Microsoft Photoshop&quot; down the line, the company has to make an effort to dissuade the &quot;genericizing&quot; of the name.  Weird, maybe, but them&#039;s the rules.

J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jonathan,</p>
<p>You can of course use whatever term you&#8217;d like.  My understanding from the legal folks is that according to copyright law, they&#8217;re obligated to mount a defense of the trademark.  That is, if we don&#8217;t want to see &#8220;Microsoft Photoshop&#8221; down the line, the company has to make an effort to dissuade the &#8220;genericizing&#8221; of the name.  Weird, maybe, but them&#8217;s the rules.</p>
<p>J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
