Comments on: Aluminum pellets may facilitate hydrogen-powered car, but…

By: farrell ellis

farrell ellis — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:07:44 +0000

yes hho works 220 times more flamable than gas the only problem is the delivery and that is only a small problem we are curently working on this
Farrell ellis technition pureone enviromental inc

By: johnandrews52

johnandrews52 — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:54:13 +0000

Can we run our car with water and gas?
Can anybody tell me is the HHO Gas is real working or is another scam?

By: Tamaaki Gondo

Tamaaki Gondo — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 00:23:44 +0000

Sounds like a great idea to me. The waste product is alumina. I figured, you don’t even have to touch the gallium. Clean out the waste product, take it to a plant to separate alumina to aluminum and oxygen. The only thing the consumers have to worry about is aluminum and water. Since hydrogen is what we are looking at, I may have missed it, but, what is the waste product after the hydrogen is used for combustion or with other methods requiring the use of hydrogen? Also, there is an Israeli company, Engineuity, has somewhat of a similar idea. Amnon Yogev, one of two of the founder of Engineuity, thought of using heated water and a coil of either magnesium or aluminum. Same concept of having hydrogen on demand, but a different approach. Both ideas, yours and theirs, are great. Still, what will be the real waste product when hydrogen is used? Which idea is more economical and evironmental friendly?

By: Bill Burns

Bill Burns — Wed, 23 May 2007 21:31:34 +0000

This is a great idea, and trying to look at the “down-sides” is ridiculous.. The aluminum-oxide AND the gallium are RECYCLED, because they’re not wasted at all in the reaction.. Gasoline on the other hand IS.. So theoretically, once we have a nice system up and running, with these metals in circulation – we won’t need anymore.. Is that the case with oil??

Also, the only other thing you need to add is water – and guess what? That’s the “waste-product” of this reaction lol.. So aside from having to convert the Aluminum Oxide back to Aluminum, there is potentially no waste, and everything in the system is reused..

Sounds like a GREAT idea to me!

By: Wes Szumera

Wes Szumera — Mon, 21 May 2007 13:11:15 +0000

What is so idiotic? Look how many tons of oil and coal we move around.

By: Bryan Woldridge

Bryan Woldridge — Mon, 21 May 2007 05:26:43 +0000

Mr Woodall what’s the real reason your touting this ridiculous scheme?

I don’t need any mathematics whatsoever to tell you that moving tons and tons of aluminum, alumina and gallium to remote nuclear powered smelters is just plain idiotic.

–bw

By: Mark Evans

Mark Evans — Mon, 21 May 2007 02:58:28 +0000

Are you kidding? Aluminum is the second most abundant element at the earth’s surface. The gallium, on the other hand, could become an issue. You may want to check gallium futures after this announcement.

By: Jane Peters

Jane Peters — Mon, 21 May 2007 00:54:57 +0000

Is Aluminum a limited resource? Are we just swapping one limite resource with another?