eHarmony criticized and parodied

June 3, 2007

eHarmony faces criticism and parodies Friday’s lawsuit in California was only the tip of the iceberg. Rival matchmaking services have also launched an attack on eHarmony, criticizing its policy of providing online matchmaking services only to straight couples.

“We are disappointed in eHarmony’s continued practice of discriminating against the gay community,” announced the CEO of Perfectmatch today. He also faulted eHarmony for rejecting applicants who have been divorced too many times. “We never have and never will judge our members.”

Friday the founder of MyPartnerPerfect announced the launch of a rival service dedicated exclusively to matchmaking services for gay men. And Chemistry.com has been attacking eHarmony’s policy directly, in a new multi-million dollar ad campaign which shows people describing their experiences of rejection from eHarmony. It reports that over 1 million people have been rejected by eHarmony.com, then touts their own slogan — “Come as you are.” [youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=NgxOhG2nDOA[/youtube] eHarmony was furious, according to the Washington Post, and asked that the ads be pulled from television or amended with some softer language.

It’s all brought tremendous publicity to the caveats that eHarmony reserves for its service. It’s not clear whether eHarmony can be be legally compelled to extend their match-making services to gay and lesbian date-seekers. But in some way, the free market is already starting to weigh in.

“[W]e believe eHarmony will do whatever it wants…” said the CEO of Perfect match, “but that consumers will be the ultimate judge as to whether institutional discrimination is smart business.”

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon


Related Posts:

14 Responses to “eHarmony criticized and parodied”

  1. Catmoves:

    This is a privately owned web site and as such it can make whatever rules it chooses. There are many other sites on the Internet that I will not join because I do not approve of their privacy policy and/or TOS. It’s a tempest in a teapot.

  2. Watching Eyes:

    Catmoves, that may not be the case.

    There are laws in place that prevent discrimination. eHarmony’s policies may run afoul of those laws.

    Guess we’ll have to wait and see what happens.

    —-

    http://watching-eyes.blogspot.com/

  3. Weseepeople:

    I am not sure if eHarmony could be forced do what it does not want to. Yet I believe everyone should be treated the same. Could we exclude Neil Clark Warren from the same rights? I am confused!!

  4. Michael:

    My thoughts are “The Gay & Lesbian community have gone too far & need to be put back in the closet where they belong.”

  5. Erik:

    Michael if you were a woman I would pursue you to no end.

  6. random:

    Michael, Eric, good thing you met on here. eHarmony would reject you in a second…

  7. Carter:

    That’s cool, fags and dykes get lost!

  8. Doubting Thomas:

    Anyone who thinks they’ll meet the love of their life online is seriously stupid.

  9. anonymous:

    Did you all know that eHarmony owns Gayharmony.net? Just scroll down on this website to the bottom where it says Registrant: http://www.whois.net/whois_new.cgi?d=gayharmony&tld=net

  10. kevin:

    Did you all know that eHarmony owns Gayharmony.net?

    ——————-

    Does it also give you a cold shoulder after you waste an hour of your life filling out the requisite form?

  11. Mark:

    Watching Eyes says …………………

    There are laws in place that prevent discrimination. eHarmony’s policies may run afoul of those laws.

    Please cite any such ‘laws’, and a copy of a website where you scanned in your criminal complaint, Just like I find on Smoking Gun,……oh!, you DON’T have one? amazing.

    I deal with facts.

    I also will express my opinion, but label it clearly, I do not like the EHarmony ads, and I never have.

    I do not subscribe to the fake Christian morals, because I am a believer, and ‘Christians’ typically describe what they are by not believing their own Bible anymore.

  12. Mark:

    Watching Eyes says …………………
    9overcoming duplicate discriminator)
    Tere r lawz n palce taht preevnt dismircination.

    Please cite any such ‘laws’, and a copy of a website where you scanned in your criminal complaint, Just like I find on Smoking Gun,……oh!, you DON’T have one? amazing.

    I deal with facts, sir.

    I also will express my opinion, but label it clearly, I do not like the EHarmony ads, and I never have.

    I do not subscribe to the fake Christian morals, because I am a believer, and ‘Christians’ typically describe what they are by not believing their own Bible anymore.

  13. Anonymous:

    I DONT SERVE THEM SMELLY BLACKS IN MY PRIVATELY OWNED STORE, I CAN MAKE WHATEVER RULES I WANT!

  14. Doodee:

    Thanks for sharing

Leave a Reply:


Recent stories

Featured stories

RSS Windows news

RSS Mac news

RSS iPhone & Touch

RSS Mobile technology news

RSS Green tech

RSS Buying guides

RSS Gaming news

RSS Photography news

Copyright © 2010 Blorge.com