Comments on: Digital camera Wi-Fi memory card coming soon

By: road runner sports coupons

road runner sports coupons — Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:10:39 +0000

A lot of whatever you point out is astonishingly accurate and that makes me ponder why I hadn’t looked at this in this light previously. This piece truly did switch the light on for me personally as far as this specific topic goes. But there is actually one factor I am not necessarily too comfortable with and whilst I attempt to reconcile that with the core theme of your issue, let me see just what all the rest of the readers have to say.Very well done.

By: Kari Lamos

Kari Lamos — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:44:00 +0000

I am pleased with this camera so much that I would recommend this camera to my friends, family and anyone else looking to buy. It’s a real beauty!

By: Gary

Gary — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 05:04:00 +0000

Nice review…….!

By: Jo

Jo — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:38:11 +0000

If you are looking to purchase any digital camera, camcorder, or accessories and need reviews and ratings go to this helpful site: ReviewView is a link .

By: asd

asd — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:35:55 +0000

Would it be able to SMB with a remote PC so that any digital camera would view the SD card as if it had like 750GB of disk space?

By: Chuck

Chuck — Sat, 11 Aug 2007 22:39:45 +0000

Yeah, that’s true Gary. PixiDeal is really the best place to get your cameras and Digital Frames. Their website is nice also.

By: Gary

Gary — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:16:47 +0000

Can’t wait for it to come out. I know they’ve started to create wi-fi digital picture frames (http://www.pixideal.ca/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage=flypage.tpl&product_id=2751&option=com_virtuemart&Itemid=76), so you can upload pictures on them from your laptop. Amazing.

By: EddyKilowatt

EddyKilowatt — Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:21:22 +0000

I stumbled in here on a Google for ["digital camera" bluetooth].

It’s amazing to me that digital cameras are as capable as they’ve become, and yet users still have to futz with USB cables and card readers to offload them. Why do we have this little technical backwater in the otherwise-breathtaking world of digital camera tech?

Look at the ubiquity of Bluetooth on cell phones. Who wouldn’t choose to just sit their camera next to the computer and have them pair up and download, if they could? Can it be THAT difficult to get a few hundred megabits/sec over a strictly-limited few feet? Wasn’t Bluetooth built to scale to this speed/distance level gracefully?

Eddy

By: Jeff

Jeff — Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:03:04 +0000

@The Phantom

Mobile WiMax is giving speeds of about 2Mb in practice. That’s as slow as bluetooth (although with more range). Why would anybody care about WiMax (unless they live deep in the middle of the countryside)?

By: Jonathan

Jonathan — Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:26:39 +0000

I’d cough up the cash for that kind of functionality, no doubt. I’ll bet I’d also probably take more pictures, and do more webby/sharing/blah blah with them, too, if there was no wire.

…now if someone can come up with GPS-enabled photo-tagging, too…