<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New NASA Data Still Proves Global Warming is Real</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/</link>
	<description>Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Toodles</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/comment-page-1/#comment-167156</link>
		<dc:creator>Toodles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/#comment-167156</guid>
		<description>This completely bonkers and if you think i am going to fall for this nonsense that everyone is posting on this godforsaken website then you are barking up the wrong tree. Honestly though, If you think rationanally then you will realise that you can&#039;t actually read these stupid graphs! That is how you tell whether or not this whole baloney is true. So take my advice and Get off this site!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This completely bonkers and if you think i am going to fall for this nonsense that everyone is posting on this godforsaken website then you are barking up the wrong tree. Honestly though, If you think rationanally then you will realise that you can&#8217;t actually read these stupid graphs! That is how you tell whether or not this whole baloney is true. So take my advice and Get off this site!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toodles</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/comment-page-1/#comment-167155</link>
		<dc:creator>Toodles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/#comment-167155</guid>
		<description>Why! I think global warming is a complete myth!!! Nothing is happening at all!! This site is rrrrrrrrrrrrrrruuuuuuuuuuuuuubbbbbbbbiiiiiiiiiissssssssshhhhhhh! Honestly! Give us the facts not some made up graphs that don’t prove a sausage! Scientists are just JESTERS in scientists coats!! All this stupid Rubbish gobbledygook means absolutely nothing!! Zilch. nada! Null! Zero!!!!!!!!!!! If you believe in this brain washing nonsense then you are a fool and thats the truth! Scientists are just trying to get people worried so they will get more money so they can live in the lap of luxury while we all live in fear! Well i’m not falling for it and neither should you!!!!!!!!!!!! This completely bonkers and if you think i am going to fall for this nonsense that everyone is posting on this godforsaken website then you are barking up the wrong tree. Honestly though, If you think rationanally then you will realise that you can&#039;t actually read these stupid graphs! That is how you tell whether or not this whole baloney is true. So take my advice and Get off this site!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why! I think global warming is a complete myth!!! Nothing is happening at all!! This site is rrrrrrrrrrrrrrruuuuuuuuuuuuuubbbbbbbbiiiiiiiiiissssssssshhhhhhh! Honestly! Give us the facts not some made up graphs that don’t prove a sausage! Scientists are just JESTERS in scientists coats!! All this stupid Rubbish gobbledygook means absolutely nothing!! Zilch. nada! Null! Zero!!!!!!!!!!! If you believe in this brain washing nonsense then you are a fool and thats the truth! Scientists are just trying to get people worried so they will get more money so they can live in the lap of luxury while we all live in fear! Well i’m not falling for it and neither should you!!!!!!!!!!!! This completely bonkers and if you think i am going to fall for this nonsense that everyone is posting on this godforsaken website then you are barking up the wrong tree. Honestly though, If you think rationanally then you will realise that you can&#8217;t actually read these stupid graphs! That is how you tell whether or not this whole baloney is true. So take my advice and Get off this site!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Stokman</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/comment-page-1/#comment-153071</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Stokman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/#comment-153071</guid>
		<description>I have checked out many canadian weather stations temperature records that go back more than 100 years. The information is all available online. I&#039;ve looked at annual temperatures, 10 year and 30 year rolling average temperatures. There was a warm period in the 20&#039;s to 40&#039;s and a definate cooling period in the 60&#039;s and 70&#039;s. I am old enough to remember when there were warning of another ice age in the media of the mid 70&#039;s. If human carbon production is the cause of temperature change does that mean that we had more man made carbon in the 20&#039;s to 40&#039;s than we had in the 60&#039;s and 70&#039;s after the post war boom? Also I encourage people to check a the web site, www.surfacestations.org to see how many weather stations in the USA have significant error in them because of the way they Are situated. Why is it that there are a number of intelligent credible experienced climatologists who have diverging views on global warming? Why doesn&#039;t Al Gore show that when the carbon /temperature graphs are layed on top of each other that the temperature moves up or down first before the carbon moves up or down? If I were to need life saving heart surgery and I had a choice on the one had between having an experienced heart surgeon who had many successful operations and on the other hand having a life time politician who watched ER every week operate on my heart I would choose the heart surgeon. Why are we choosing a lifetime politician, ie Al Gore instead of many highly qualified intelligent climatologists. Since when are Politicians totally and completely believable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have checked out many canadian weather stations temperature records that go back more than 100 years. The information is all available online. I&#8217;ve looked at annual temperatures, 10 year and 30 year rolling average temperatures. There was a warm period in the 20&#8217;s to 40&#8217;s and a definate cooling period in the 60&#8217;s and 70&#8217;s. I am old enough to remember when there were warning of another ice age in the media of the mid 70&#8217;s. If human carbon production is the cause of temperature change does that mean that we had more man made carbon in the 20&#8217;s to 40&#8217;s than we had in the 60&#8217;s and 70&#8217;s after the post war boom? Also I encourage people to check a the web site, <a href="http://www.surfacestations.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.surfacestations.org</a> to see how many weather stations in the USA have significant error in them because of the way they Are situated. Why is it that there are a number of intelligent credible experienced climatologists who have diverging views on global warming? Why doesn&#8217;t Al Gore show that when the carbon /temperature graphs are layed on top of each other that the temperature moves up or down first before the carbon moves up or down? If I were to need life saving heart surgery and I had a choice on the one had between having an experienced heart surgeon who had many successful operations and on the other hand having a life time politician who watched ER every week operate on my heart I would choose the heart surgeon. Why are we choosing a lifetime politician, ie Al Gore instead of many highly qualified intelligent climatologists. Since when are Politicians totally and completely believable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arno Arrak</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/comment-page-1/#comment-141562</link>
		<dc:creator>Arno Arrak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/#comment-141562</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s UNREAL!!!!!! Why? Because the warming ended with the twentieth century. Global temperatures since then have not changed, within statistical limits of observation, and a cooling trend may very well on the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s UNREAL!!!!!! Why? Because the warming ended with the twentieth century. Global temperatures since then have not changed, within statistical limits of observation, and a cooling trend may very well on the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bones</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/comment-page-1/#comment-90562</link>
		<dc:creator>bones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 17:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/#comment-90562</guid>
		<description>GLOBAL WARMING IS REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GLOBAL WARMING IS REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penis</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/comment-page-1/#comment-50025</link>
		<dc:creator>penis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 23:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/#comment-50025</guid>
		<description>well no one knows if global warming is real or not. There is so much contradicting evidence i think people should stop being dramatic pussies claiming the world is going to end. NO ONE HAS ANY IDEA WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT. The earth has hotter years then others and while having colder years then others.Enjoy           (.)(.)
                                             / 
                                 :=====&gt;()</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well no one knows if global warming is real or not. There is so much contradicting evidence i think people should stop being dramatic pussies claiming the world is going to end. NO ONE HAS ANY IDEA WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT. The earth has hotter years then others and while having colder years then others.Enjoy           (.)(.)<br />
                                             /<br />
                                 :=====&gt;()</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penis</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/comment-page-1/#comment-50023</link>
		<dc:creator>penis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 23:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/#comment-50023</guid>
		<description>well no one knows if global warming is real or not. There is so much contradicting evidence i think people should stop being dramatic pussies claiming the world is going to end. NO ONE HAS ANY IDEA WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT. The earth has hotter years then others and while having colder years then others.                  (.)(.)
                                             / 
                                 :=====&gt;()</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well no one knows if global warming is real or not. There is so much contradicting evidence i think people should stop being dramatic pussies claiming the world is going to end. NO ONE HAS ANY IDEA WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT. The earth has hotter years then others and while having colder years then others.                  (.)(.)<br />
                                             /<br />
                                 :=====&gt;()</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria Belanger</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/comment-page-1/#comment-42626</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Belanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/#comment-42626</guid>
		<description>im in 7th grade and my science teacher told us that global warming is real, well i spoke out and said that was his oppinion.now i have a 2 page essay due tommorow giving proof that it isnt real if anyone nows websites thatcould help me. i i dont do the report i get I.S.S (in school suspention) i dont like my science teacher,but istill like science!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im in 7th grade and my science teacher told us that global warming is real, well i spoke out and said that was his oppinion.now i have a 2 page essay due tommorow giving proof that it isnt real if anyone nows websites thatcould help me. i i dont do the report i get I.S.S (in school suspention) i dont like my science teacher,but istill like science!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j braggins</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/comment-page-1/#comment-42173</link>
		<dc:creator>j braggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/#comment-42173</guid>
		<description>Perhaps someone can make sense of the last sentence, but its on a par with the logic of the rest of the blog.

 The whole argument is a &#039;strawman&#039;.

 Is the supposed average temperature of the Earth&#039;s atmosphere the correct metric to measure climate? Hardly, changes in ocean currents have changes in    
temps. far greater than anything AGGase&#039;s could do, and they change in decadel cycles or multi-decadel for which there is little predictive ability.
  Get up to speed on the greenhouse effect, it was proved false by two Austrian Physicists in July 07, or better still, read &quot;Apocalypse Canceled&quot; Monkton, for a well argued case for natural forces being by far the major cause of what warming there is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps someone can make sense of the last sentence, but its on a par with the logic of the rest of the blog.</p>
<p> The whole argument is a &#8217;strawman&#8217;.</p>
<p> Is the supposed average temperature of the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere the correct metric to measure climate? Hardly, changes in ocean currents have changes in<br />
temps. far greater than anything AGGase&#8217;s could do, and they change in decadel cycles or multi-decadel for which there is little predictive ability.<br />
  Get up to speed on the greenhouse effect, it was proved false by two Austrian Physicists in July 07, or better still, read &#8220;Apocalypse Canceled&#8221; Monkton, for a well argued case for natural forces being by far the major cause of what warming there is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fran Manns, Ph.D., P.Geo. (Ontario)</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/comment-page-1/#comment-23280</link>
		<dc:creator>Fran Manns, Ph.D., P.Geo. (Ontario)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/08/10/new-nasa-data-still-proves-global-warming-is-real/#comment-23280</guid>
		<description>If the surface temperatures were used for a Master&#039;s thesis, it would have been thrown out. The database is corrupt.  The &#039;science&#039; is speculation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the surface temperatures were used for a Master&#8217;s thesis, it would have been thrown out. The database is corrupt.  The &#8217;science&#8217; is speculation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
