<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gizmodo: Stay away from the iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2007/09/29/gizmodo-stay-away-from-the-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/09/29/gizmodo-stay-away-from-the-iphone/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmiller</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/09/29/gizmodo-stay-away-from-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-34636</link>
		<dc:creator>cmiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/09/29/gizmodo-stay-away-from-the-iphone/#comment-34636</guid>
		<description>LGeek:  But you are free to do anything you want with your iPhone.  You just can&#039;t have the expectation that if you modify the firmware, an update won&#039;t break something.  You are free to not update.  It is completely insane to expect Apple maintain backwards compatibility with hacks, when they haven&#039;t even frozen the API.  Nobody does that.  The fact that you think they should just means you don&#039;t know anything about software or programming.

&quot;Why brick it&quot;-- Apple didn&#039;t &quot;brick&quot; phones that merely had third party software installed, and they warned everyone that unlocked phones might be unusable after the update.  To say that they &quot;deliberately&quot; bricked phones to &quot;punish&quot; consumers is just ignorant ranting.

You should all try going on a site where the posters know something about what is involved with writing and maintaining software.  People so informed aren&#039;t surprised in the least that a hacked and unlocked phone might break when updated, and are just kind of amused at the wild sense of entitlement that has everyone demanding that Apple somehow reverse engineer any and all hacks and make sure that their software updates treat them nicely.

FYI, the PSP has a locked API at this point, so Sony doesn&#039;t have to worry about needing to change things in the future that might break third party stuff.  The iPhone is still very much in flux, it would be crazy for Apple to lock the API at this point, which is the only way they could insure that updates would play nice with hacks.

Complain about the lack of an SDK if you wish, which is a legitimate gripe, but acting like Apple owes its customers a phone that can be hacked without repercussions is just dumb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LGeek:  But you are free to do anything you want with your iPhone.  You just can&#8217;t have the expectation that if you modify the firmware, an update won&#8217;t break something.  You are free to not update.  It is completely insane to expect Apple maintain backwards compatibility with hacks, when they haven&#8217;t even frozen the API.  Nobody does that.  The fact that you think they should just means you don&#8217;t know anything about software or programming.</p>
<p>&#8220;Why brick it&#8221;&#8211; Apple didn&#8217;t &#8220;brick&#8221; phones that merely had third party software installed, and they warned everyone that unlocked phones might be unusable after the update.  To say that they &#8220;deliberately&#8221; bricked phones to &#8220;punish&#8221; consumers is just ignorant ranting.</p>
<p>You should all try going on a site where the posters know something about what is involved with writing and maintaining software.  People so informed aren&#8217;t surprised in the least that a hacked and unlocked phone might break when updated, and are just kind of amused at the wild sense of entitlement that has everyone demanding that Apple somehow reverse engineer any and all hacks and make sure that their software updates treat them nicely.</p>
<p>FYI, the PSP has a locked API at this point, so Sony doesn&#8217;t have to worry about needing to change things in the future that might break third party stuff.  The iPhone is still very much in flux, it would be crazy for Apple to lock the API at this point, which is the only way they could insure that updates would play nice with hacks.</p>
<p>Complain about the lack of an SDK if you wish, which is a legitimate gripe, but acting like Apple owes its customers a phone that can be hacked without repercussions is just dumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nsane Noob</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/09/29/gizmodo-stay-away-from-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-34605</link>
		<dc:creator>Nsane Noob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/09/29/gizmodo-stay-away-from-the-iphone/#comment-34605</guid>
		<description>I just think the Ipod Touch is the same thing as the IPhone without being able to talk to people with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just think the Ipod Touch is the same thing as the IPhone without being able to talk to people with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Important</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/09/29/gizmodo-stay-away-from-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-34598</link>
		<dc:creator>Important</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/09/29/gizmodo-stay-away-from-the-iphone/#comment-34598</guid>
		<description>I would agree with the previous post. Even in someone has a hacked version of XP, microsoft will harass users with WGA, but not tell your computer to self destruct. Tsk Tsk. Apple seems to have taken the industry&#039;s #1 bully spot. But I digress.

Third party apps are crucial for any OS! That is why Palm did so well, and still has many people using it. People made tons of things for the Palm. Also Windows. People have made countless apps for Windows. And when OS X rolled around people could &quot;port&quot; linux apps to run on it and Apple sold more computers. Apple needs to realize that. And its a never ending battle. Look at the PSP. You cannot win! Sony has released like 30 firmware updates for the PSP, and people still are using 3rd party apps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree with the previous post. Even in someone has a hacked version of XP, microsoft will harass users with WGA, but not tell your computer to self destruct. Tsk Tsk. Apple seems to have taken the industry&#8217;s #1 bully spot. But I digress.</p>
<p>Third party apps are crucial for any OS! That is why Palm did so well, and still has many people using it. People made tons of things for the Palm. Also Windows. People have made countless apps for Windows. And when OS X rolled around people could &#8220;port&#8221; linux apps to run on it and Apple sold more computers. Apple needs to realize that. And its a never ending battle. Look at the PSP. You cannot win! Sony has released like 30 firmware updates for the PSP, and people still are using 3rd party apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Brick it ? Why be Hostile Customers ?</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/09/29/gizmodo-stay-away-from-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-34595</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Brick it ? Why be Hostile Customers ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/09/29/gizmodo-stay-away-from-the-iphone/#comment-34595</guid>
		<description>I disagree...Why?  Yes, perhaps the users should not have unlocked the phones, but so you should have not jay-walk. If a car ses you jay-walking and speeds up and slams you to kill and punishyou since you should not be jay-walking, is it OK?
I suspect, it is not OK. Right?

Disabling the unlocked or 3rd part apps is one thing, making the whole device unusable to punish the consumer is another thing. 

I do not own iPhone and will not own one as it does not offer the capabilities of a BlackBerry. But I just purchased an iPod Touch and will return it back to practice my punitive action as a consumer since punishment is a favorite way of relationship between Apple and its customers nowadays. Apple&#039;s action is consumer hostile and should be strongly reacted by all of us. Apple has no long term gain to brick phone. Apple should come up with another update to unbrick the phones but disable unlocking and 3rd party apps only. Even Microsoft has never done anything like this..Shame on Apple, shame on Steve Jobs..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree&#8230;Why?  Yes, perhaps the users should not have unlocked the phones, but so you should have not jay-walk. If a car ses you jay-walking and speeds up and slams you to kill and punishyou since you should not be jay-walking, is it OK?<br />
I suspect, it is not OK. Right?</p>
<p>Disabling the unlocked or 3rd part apps is one thing, making the whole device unusable to punish the consumer is another thing. </p>
<p>I do not own iPhone and will not own one as it does not offer the capabilities of a BlackBerry. But I just purchased an iPod Touch and will return it back to practice my punitive action as a consumer since punishment is a favorite way of relationship between Apple and its customers nowadays. Apple&#8217;s action is consumer hostile and should be strongly reacted by all of us. Apple has no long term gain to brick phone. Apple should come up with another update to unbrick the phones but disable unlocking and 3rd party apps only. Even Microsoft has never done anything like this..Shame on Apple, shame on Steve Jobs..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LGgeek</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/09/29/gizmodo-stay-away-from-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-34498</link>
		<dc:creator>LGgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 01:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/09/29/gizmodo-stay-away-from-the-iphone/#comment-34498</guid>
		<description>&quot;the company that makes the device can set the rules&quot;, nope I paid for it I&#039;ll do anything I want with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the company that makes the device can set the rules&#8221;, nope I paid for it I&#8217;ll do anything I want with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin G</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/09/29/gizmodo-stay-away-from-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-34462</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 21:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/09/29/gizmodo-stay-away-from-the-iphone/#comment-34462</guid>
		<description>Although I agree that complaining after hacking is a no no, Be a little more forward thinking before saying that about 3rd party applications.  They are a vital part of what makes a device or an operating system viable for the long term.  Apple didn&#039;t put OS X on these devices just cause its pretty.  

Also if Apple wants to stop this free for all battle, they should:

1. Pick a carrier for the iphone that doesn&#039;t suck

2. create and distribute their own cool apps so we don&#039;t have to rely solely on 3rd party developers to take advantage of the power of the OS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I agree that complaining after hacking is a no no, Be a little more forward thinking before saying that about 3rd party applications.  They are a vital part of what makes a device or an operating system viable for the long term.  Apple didn&#8217;t put OS X on these devices just cause its pretty.  </p>
<p>Also if Apple wants to stop this free for all battle, they should:</p>
<p>1. Pick a carrier for the iphone that doesn&#8217;t suck</p>
<p>2. create and distribute their own cool apps so we don&#8217;t have to rely solely on 3rd party developers to take advantage of the power of the OS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

