<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg buries autobury gaming algorithm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2007/10/01/digg-buries-autobury-gaming-algorithm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/10/01/digg-buries-autobury-gaming-algorithm/</link>
	<description>Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Everton</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/10/01/digg-buries-autobury-gaming-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-34964</link>
		<dc:creator>Everton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 05:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/10/01/digg-buries-autobury-gaming-algorithm/#comment-34964</guid>
		<description>Spotted this in my Google alerts - thanks for doing the analysis.  I think the autobury is still going strong.  It looks like Digg didn&#039;t bother burying the story that made it &#039;through&#039; because it only got 1 digg!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spotted this in my Google alerts &#8211; thanks for doing the analysis.  I think the autobury is still going strong.  It looks like Digg didn&#8217;t bother burying the story that made it &#8216;through&#8217; because it only got 1 digg!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
