<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony to start selling 40GB PS3 in Europe Oct. 10, Australia Oct. 11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2007/10/06/sony-to-start-selling-40gb-ps3-in-europe-oct-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/10/06/sony-to-start-selling-40gb-ps3-in-europe-oct-10/</link>
	<description>Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/10/06/sony-to-start-selling-40gb-ps3-in-europe-oct-10/comment-page-1/#comment-36297</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 04:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/10/06/sony-to-start-selling-40gb-ps3-in-europe-oct-10/#comment-36297</guid>
		<description>..hmmm... no mention of Phil Harrison&#039;s claims last year that backwards compatibility is a &quot;core value of what we believe we should offer&quot;... figures.

Given the fact that compelling PS2 titles have continued to be released since the release of the PS3 (God of War II, anyone?), surely the lack of PS2 compatibility merits some minute amount of concern?

Ok, sure, who doesn&#039;t have a PS2 already?  And yet... what sense does it make to abandon the most wildly successful platform in gaming history (that may be hyperbole, but not by much) for those newcomers who do not own a PS2 or those who do but do not have any room for it now that Mongo has moved in.

This is just stupid and shortsighted.  No, PS2 titles are not going to move PS3 consoles, but considering the losses that Sony is taking on the PS3, those titles would provide a welcome cushion and would provide PS3 owners with a wealth of fantastic titles while they wait for the new catalog to get some meat on its bones.

But hey, I know you guys are tired out from railing Nintendo for not doubling production on that console nobody wants anyway.  Don&#039;t strain yourselves with critical thought.

You might pull something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..hmmm&#8230; no mention of Phil Harrison&#8217;s claims last year that backwards compatibility is a &#8220;core value of what we believe we should offer&#8221;&#8230; figures.</p>
<p>Given the fact that compelling PS2 titles have continued to be released since the release of the PS3 (God of War II, anyone?), surely the lack of PS2 compatibility merits some minute amount of concern?</p>
<p>Ok, sure, who doesn&#8217;t have a PS2 already?  And yet&#8230; what sense does it make to abandon the most wildly successful platform in gaming history (that may be hyperbole, but not by much) for those newcomers who do not own a PS2 or those who do but do not have any room for it now that Mongo has moved in.</p>
<p>This is just stupid and shortsighted.  No, PS2 titles are not going to move PS3 consoles, but considering the losses that Sony is taking on the PS3, those titles would provide a welcome cushion and would provide PS3 owners with a wealth of fantastic titles while they wait for the new catalog to get some meat on its bones.</p>
<p>But hey, I know you guys are tired out from railing Nintendo for not doubling production on that console nobody wants anyway.  Don&#8217;t strain yourselves with critical thought.</p>
<p>You might pull something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
