<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia boss to create Facebook and Google killer in one?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2007/11/16/wikipedia-boss-to-create-facebook-and-google-killer-in-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/11/16/wikipedia-boss-to-create-facebook-and-google-killer-in-one/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Carl Edwin Lindgren</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/11/16/wikipedia-boss-to-create-facebook-and-google-killer-in-one/comment-page-1/#comment-152363</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Carl Edwin Lindgren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/11/16/wikipedia-boss-to-create-facebook-and-google-killer-in-one/#comment-152363</guid>
		<description>Wikipedia is at best garbage. The following remark appeared on Wikipedia - “What I’m seeing is a lot of puffed-up titles with little backing or significance, employment at something one step up from a diploma mill, and no sign of real academic notability (or for that matter real-world notability as measured by major media attention). —David Eppstein (talk) 08:04, 15 December 2008 (UTC)” The ‘professor’ was referring in part to American Military University. AMU has over 30,000 students and is regionally accredited. When does this rubbish stop? I believe this is libel at best. Few academicians ever use Wikipedia.  Try looking up the terrible job done on &quot;chivalric orders&quot;. Wikipedia is merely a vanity rag and not an academic tool. Remember, your six year old sister or daughter can be an editor!

Carl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia is at best garbage. The following remark appeared on Wikipedia &#8211; “What I’m seeing is a lot of puffed-up titles with little backing or significance, employment at something one step up from a diploma mill, and no sign of real academic notability (or for that matter real-world notability as measured by major media attention). —David Eppstein (talk) 08:04, 15 December 2008 (UTC)” The ‘professor’ was referring in part to American Military University. AMU has over 30,000 students and is regionally accredited. When does this rubbish stop? I believe this is libel at best. Few academicians ever use Wikipedia.  Try looking up the terrible job done on &#8220;chivalric orders&#8221;. Wikipedia is merely a vanity rag and not an academic tool. Remember, your six year old sister or daughter can be an editor!</p>
<p>Carl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david hill</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/11/16/wikipedia-boss-to-create-facebook-and-google-killer-in-one/comment-page-1/#comment-53218</link>
		<dc:creator>david hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/11/16/wikipedia-boss-to-create-facebook-and-google-killer-in-one/#comment-53218</guid>
		<description>WIKIPEDIA and all its constituent satellites should be totally banned from major research institutions throughout the world for it provides the means for distortions and untruths to be put in print across the whole globe. This cannot be good for humankind as if people start to believe every word that appears in Wikipedia, they will get things wrong. It is as simple as that, but the consequences could be huge for economies and people.
If you wish to read more I suggest that you get a full insight into Wikipedia and visit http://www.thewif.org.uk/version2/nlett/class/main0.html
and go to the bottom of the page.

Wikipedia is run in reality by a bunch of overgrown kids who do not care about those who really count, the people themselves.

Dr. David Hill
World Innovation Foundation
Bern, Switzerland</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WIKIPEDIA and all its constituent satellites should be totally banned from major research institutions throughout the world for it provides the means for distortions and untruths to be put in print across the whole globe. This cannot be good for humankind as if people start to believe every word that appears in Wikipedia, they will get things wrong. It is as simple as that, but the consequences could be huge for economies and people.<br />
If you wish to read more I suggest that you get a full insight into Wikipedia and visit <a href="http://www.thewif.org.uk/version2/nlett/class/main0.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thewif.org.uk/version2/nlett/class/main0.html</a><br />
and go to the bottom of the page.</p>
<p>Wikipedia is run in reality by a bunch of overgrown kids who do not care about those who really count, the people themselves.</p>
<p>Dr. David Hill<br />
World Innovation Foundation<br />
Bern, Switzerland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

