<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg users flock to Mixx</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2007/11/24/digg-users-flock-to-mixx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/11/24/digg-users-flock-to-mixx/</link>
	<description>Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Bingrett</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/11/24/digg-users-flock-to-mixx/comment-page-1/#comment-56413</link>
		<dc:creator>James Bingrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 05:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/11/24/digg-users-flock-to-mixx/#comment-56413</guid>
		<description>Something is going on and it is a bit weird as Mixx is only a digg clone. There are lots of them. I think Earthfrisk.com has a lit more features that you see right from the homepage, yet pligg the open source software is used for both.  Digg is great and will stay the king in my opinion, just that the hype of a site that is less than other semi clones like earthfrisk seems a little stupid. Not that I&#039;m saying this site is, just be careful of who we  all get information from. Refugees from Digg or any site always bad mouth that site. That doesn&#039;t means we should follow them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something is going on and it is a bit weird as Mixx is only a digg clone. There are lots of them. I think Earthfrisk.com has a lit more features that you see right from the homepage, yet pligg the open source software is used for both.  Digg is great and will stay the king in my opinion, just that the hype of a site that is less than other semi clones like earthfrisk seems a little stupid. Not that I&#8217;m saying this site is, just be careful of who we  all get information from. Refugees from Digg or any site always bad mouth that site. That doesn&#8217;t means we should follow them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Pospisil</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2007/11/24/digg-users-flock-to-mixx/comment-page-1/#comment-53768</link>
		<dc:creator>John Pospisil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2007/11/24/digg-users-flock-to-mixx/#comment-53768</guid>
		<description>A complaint from IP: 216.40.70.113 has been received about this article. The purported complainant has been contacted, but at the time of writing, no response has been received.

We treat all complaints seriously, but we do need receive the complaint via fax, phone or email so that we can be sure the complaint is legitimate. Our contact details are openly available - click on Contact details in the left hand side bar.

Any further correspondence on this issue should be directed to john@blorge.com

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A complaint from IP: 216.40.70.113 has been received about this article. The purported complainant has been contacted, but at the time of writing, no response has been received.</p>
<p>We treat all complaints seriously, but we do need receive the complaint via fax, phone or email so that we can be sure the complaint is legitimate. Our contact details are openly available &#8211; click on Contact details in the left hand side bar.</p>
<p>Any further correspondence on this issue should be directed to <a href="mailto:john@blorge.com">john@blorge.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
