<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media groups drop DRM for more invasive watermarking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2008/01/12/media-groups-drop-drm-for-more-invasive-watermarking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/01/12/media-groups-drop-drm-for-more-invasive-watermarking/</link>
	<description>Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gerd Leonhard</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/01/12/media-groups-drop-drm-for-more-invasive-watermarking/comment-page-1/#comment-69692</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerd Leonhard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/01/12/media-groups-drop-drm-for-more-invasive-watermarking/#comment-69692</guid>
		<description>On the juicy subject of DRM, I have just published a short video with a bottom-line explanation of why the record labels&#039; quest for control is (was?) utterly ridiculous; and why we will very likely see some quick impeachments of the key players this year - the proponents of DRM will eat it in 2008, imho.

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OClWvLFMUfs

Gerd Leonhard, Media Futurist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the juicy subject of DRM, I have just published a short video with a bottom-line explanation of why the record labels&#8217; quest for control is (was?) utterly ridiculous; and why we will very likely see some quick impeachments of the key players this year &#8211; the proponents of DRM will eat it in 2008, imho.</p>
<p>  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OClWvLFMUfs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OClWvLFMUfs</a></p>
<p>Gerd Leonhard, Media Futurist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/01/12/media-groups-drop-drm-for-more-invasive-watermarking/comment-page-1/#comment-68843</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/01/12/media-groups-drop-drm-for-more-invasive-watermarking/#comment-68843</guid>
		<description>This would have gone from a good to great article with some links to backup the content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would have gone from a good to great article with some links to backup the content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
