<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 more add-ons to make Firefox more productive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2008/02/10/5-more-add-ons-to-make-firefox-more-productive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/02/10/5-more-add-ons-to-make-firefox-more-productive/</link>
	<description>Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/02/10/5-more-add-ons-to-make-firefox-more-productive/comment-page-1/#comment-75252</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/02/10/5-more-add-ons-to-make-firefox-more-productive/#comment-75252</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Derek, but here is the problem with integrating it into firefox. it would require firefox to make sure an update any security holes with all the new features and keep them going well. now that is good and all, but it MAY draw away from the core or the program. The security issues in that and making the core better.

So, it may be a good idea, it may not be, to integrate all of it together</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Derek, but here is the problem with integrating it into firefox. it would require firefox to make sure an update any security holes with all the new features and keep them going well. now that is good and all, but it MAY draw away from the core or the program. The security issues in that and making the core better.</p>
<p>So, it may be a good idea, it may not be, to integrate all of it together</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/02/10/5-more-add-ons-to-make-firefox-more-productive/comment-page-1/#comment-75237</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/02/10/5-more-add-ons-to-make-firefox-more-productive/#comment-75237</guid>
		<description>Firefox is the king of plugins holding a special place in people&#039;s heart, but I think this is its biggest flaw and a major reason I stay away.

I&#039;m always being told that I should get this plugin and that plugin and Firefox will not only be the best browser ever, but it will make a mean grilled cheese...mmmm. While a grilled cheese sounds tasty this is the problem. I shouldn&#039;t have to install one or two plugins or no plugins. The miryad of plugins that you can install is unecessary.

I&#039;m a Opera user and a Firefox user with a Web Tools and Reg.Expression plugins. I always use Opera and feel that as a browser it is the best alternative to IE, not Firefox. I believe this because all I have to do is download it and it is fast, secure, offers amazing features and tools, good memory managment, Speed Dial feature, and perfect integration with my mobile web. 

Opera, for me, wins over Firefox because it&#039;s great right out of the box. I don&#039;t need to download plugins to tune it up. What the team at Mozilla should do is include what they see as the most essential plugins in the installation of the browser. This would allow Firefox to be better integrated with a core set of plugins, making the browser experience better. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox is the king of plugins holding a special place in people&#8217;s heart, but I think this is its biggest flaw and a major reason I stay away.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m always being told that I should get this plugin and that plugin and Firefox will not only be the best browser ever, but it will make a mean grilled cheese&#8230;mmmm. While a grilled cheese sounds tasty this is the problem. I shouldn&#8217;t have to install one or two plugins or no plugins. The miryad of plugins that you can install is unecessary.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a Opera user and a Firefox user with a Web Tools and Reg.Expression plugins. I always use Opera and feel that as a browser it is the best alternative to IE, not Firefox. I believe this because all I have to do is download it and it is fast, secure, offers amazing features and tools, good memory managment, Speed Dial feature, and perfect integration with my mobile web. </p>
<p>Opera, for me, wins over Firefox because it&#8217;s great right out of the box. I don&#8217;t need to download plugins to tune it up. What the team at Mozilla should do is include what they see as the most essential plugins in the installation of the browser. This would allow Firefox to be better integrated with a core set of plugins, making the browser experience better. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
