<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Intel Atom family of tiny low-power processors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2008/03/03/new-intel-atom-family-of-tiny-low-power-processors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/03/03/new-intel-atom-family-of-tiny-low-power-processors/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giles Smith</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/03/03/new-intel-atom-family-of-tiny-low-power-processors/comment-page-1/#comment-78907</link>
		<dc:creator>Giles Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/03/03/new-intel-atom-family-of-tiny-low-power-processors/#comment-78907</guid>
		<description>At first I thought the name Atom would be a good idea for Intel’s new chip range, but the more I think about it the more I hope that their chips won’t actually be anything like an atom and actually have some substance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first I thought the name Atom would be a good idea for Intel’s new chip range, but the more I think about it the more I hope that their chips won’t actually be anything like an atom and actually have some substance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

