Comments on: There is no Web 2.0 or Web 3.0 or Web "number dot whatever" http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/04/18/there-is-no-web-20-or-web-30-or-web-number-dot-whatever/ Top Technology news Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:30:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Kevin http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/04/18/there-is-no-web-20-or-web-30-or-web-number-dot-whatever/comment-page-1/#comment-86381 Kevin Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:47:45 +0000 http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/04/18/there-is-no-web-20-or-web-30-or-web-number-dot-whatever/#comment-86381 Yes, but what about "The Grid"? (Check it out on wikipedia.) Yes, but what about “The Grid”? (Check it out on wikipedia.)

]]> By: Sachin http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/04/18/there-is-no-web-20-or-web-30-or-web-number-dot-whatever/comment-page-1/#comment-85434 Sachin Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:57:45 +0000 http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/04/18/there-is-no-web-20-or-web-30-or-web-number-dot-whatever/#comment-85434 Jonathan, I see that you come from a technical background and I can see your detest towards the "2.0" or "whatever no". Though I do not quite agree. Here are my reasons of why it is the way it is: 1) To ensure that there is a worldwide acceptance of internet, you need to repackage and pesent the benefits in a "New" wrapper. This wrapper is essentially, the new web based services which has changed the traditional application creation and the way people use internet. 2) Everything changes. So why not the name of the Web? While the world conspires to change the name of web, it gets mor acceptance with the new benefits thrown in front of the new users and gives a fresh breeze to the existing ones. 3) Every new change sees resistance, however, if the change is positive and beneficial, it does take over and presents the new world. I feel it's important that Web 2.0 as a term gets popularized and helps more organizations worldwide to adopt the benefits of the advanced web based services and applications and bring in whole new opportunities and growth! Jonathan,

I see that you come from a technical background and I can see your detest towards the “2.0″ or “whatever no”. Though I do not quite agree.

Here are my reasons of why it is the way it is:
1) To ensure that there is a worldwide acceptance of internet, you need to repackage and pesent the benefits in a “New” wrapper. This wrapper is essentially, the new web based services which has changed the traditional application creation and the way people use internet.
2) Everything changes. So why not the name of the Web? While the world conspires to change the name of web, it gets mor acceptance with the new benefits thrown in front of the new users and gives a fresh breeze to the existing ones.
3) Every new change sees resistance, however, if the change is positive and beneficial, it does take over and presents the new world.

I feel it’s important that Web 2.0 as a term gets popularized and helps more organizations worldwide to adopt the benefits of the advanced web based services and applications and bring in whole new opportunities and growth!

]]>