<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comcast fails to popularize its P2P Bill of Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2008/05/07/comcast-fails-to-popularize-its-p2p-bill-of-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/05/07/comcast-fails-to-popularize-its-p2p-bill-of-rights/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobotGeek</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/05/07/comcast-fails-to-popularize-its-p2p-bill-of-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-115278</link>
		<dc:creator>RobotGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=5127#comment-115278</guid>
		<description>This is really sad.  Comcast was actually trying to make Rights that were flexible to p2p users &amp; the industry.  But something is telling me that the RIAA &amp; MPAA was involved in getting the P2P Bill of Rights rejected, secretly.  Those prehistoric dirtbags are so paranoid that they want to drain everyones&#039; money who has the Internet &amp; put everyone in prison FOR LIFE (see PRO-IP ACT) for &quot;infringing&quot; copyright.

I can&#039;t help but laugh at the amount of corporate leaders (not just the RIAA) diagnosed with this Copyright Paranoia.  One thing is copying a file for personal use; another is copying someone&#039;s work &amp; calling it your own---which is REAL copyright infringment.  They&#039;re both completely different.  Copying is not the same as Intelectual Copying. But the RIAA &amp; US Congress doesn&#039;t seem to get that. Hasn&#039;t the term &#039;cruel &amp; unusual punishment&#039; ring any bells to any of you arrogant dinosaur-thinking jerks?  Or are you guys so blinded with dollar bills that you just don&#039;t want to admit  your legislations have caused nothing but trouble since the very start you took down Napster.?

What&#039;s is going on with the world today?  Nowadays, companies want to use their Copyright Paranoia to get everyone in trouble with the law.  Companies have become so stupid that now anyone can commit a &quot;copyright infringment&quot; &amp; not even know it.  The laws don&#039;t even fllow common logic.  Their outrageous, &amp; a waste of time, money, &amp; resources. According to the RIAA, if I make a mix CD for a friend I&#039;m infringment the copyright.  This is redicules!   I&#039;m not going to publish that CD, so why sue?  Hasn&#039;t the term &#039;cruel &amp; unusual punishment&#039; ring any bells to any of you arrogant dinosaur-thinking jerks?  Or are you guys so blinded with dollar bills that you just don&#039;t want to admit  your legislations have caused nothing but trouble since the very start you took down Napster.?  Just because you have degrees in law doesn&#039;t make any smarter than me.  But at leat I know what the consumers want.  Consumers are waking up &amp; they are not liking what their seeing.  And as much as I hate to admit, YOU GUYS STARTED IT, &amp; consumers are showing it!  What&#039;s next huh?  Charging 15 cents everytime someone plays a song, or 25 cents everytime a user mutes the music/movie file?  You all are a bunch of cowards &amp; liars &amp; you know it!  But don&#039;t worry, The People know how stubborn defacto monopolies can be, so we&#039;ll let you guys learn the hard way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really sad.  Comcast was actually trying to make Rights that were flexible to p2p users &amp; the industry.  But something is telling me that the RIAA &amp; MPAA was involved in getting the P2P Bill of Rights rejected, secretly.  Those prehistoric dirtbags are so paranoid that they want to drain everyones&#8217; money who has the Internet &amp; put everyone in prison FOR LIFE (see PRO-IP ACT) for &#8220;infringing&#8221; copyright.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but laugh at the amount of corporate leaders (not just the RIAA) diagnosed with this Copyright Paranoia.  One thing is copying a file for personal use; another is copying someone&#8217;s work &amp; calling it your own&#8212;which is REAL copyright infringment.  They&#8217;re both completely different.  Copying is not the same as Intelectual Copying. But the RIAA &amp; US Congress doesn&#8217;t seem to get that. Hasn&#8217;t the term &#8216;cruel &amp; unusual punishment&#8217; ring any bells to any of you arrogant dinosaur-thinking jerks?  Or are you guys so blinded with dollar bills that you just don&#8217;t want to admit  your legislations have caused nothing but trouble since the very start you took down Napster.?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s is going on with the world today?  Nowadays, companies want to use their Copyright Paranoia to get everyone in trouble with the law.  Companies have become so stupid that now anyone can commit a &#8220;copyright infringment&#8221; &amp; not even know it.  The laws don&#8217;t even fllow common logic.  Their outrageous, &amp; a waste of time, money, &amp; resources. According to the RIAA, if I make a mix CD for a friend I&#8217;m infringment the copyright.  This is redicules!   I&#8217;m not going to publish that CD, so why sue?  Hasn&#8217;t the term &#8216;cruel &amp; unusual punishment&#8217; ring any bells to any of you arrogant dinosaur-thinking jerks?  Or are you guys so blinded with dollar bills that you just don&#8217;t want to admit  your legislations have caused nothing but trouble since the very start you took down Napster.?  Just because you have degrees in law doesn&#8217;t make any smarter than me.  But at leat I know what the consumers want.  Consumers are waking up &amp; they are not liking what their seeing.  And as much as I hate to admit, YOU GUYS STARTED IT, &amp; consumers are showing it!  What&#8217;s next huh?  Charging 15 cents everytime someone plays a song, or 25 cents everytime a user mutes the music/movie file?  You all are a bunch of cowards &amp; liars &amp; you know it!  But don&#8217;t worry, The People know how stubborn defacto monopolies can be, so we&#8217;ll let you guys learn the hard way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

