<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chevy Volt knocked aside by &quot;bullish&quot; competitor Nissan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2008/05/13/chevy-volt-knocked-aside-by-bullish-competitor-nissan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/05/13/chevy-volt-knocked-aside-by-bullish-competitor-nissan/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Grubb</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/05/13/chevy-volt-knocked-aside-by-bullish-competitor-nissan/comment-page-1/#comment-90626</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Grubb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 22:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/05/13/chevy-volt-knocked-aside-by-bullish-competitor-nissan/#comment-90626</guid>
		<description>Nissan will join Tesla, ZENN, ZAP, Phoenix and Think building EVs (Electric Vehicles) over the next 4 years. It&#039;s unlikely anyone will produce enough volume to saturate the market anytime soon, so there&#039;s plenty of room in the pool. It&#039;s about danged time we started getting factory EVs. Perhaps Toyota will revive and rejuvenate it&#039;s RAV4 EV with Li-ion batteries.

Plug-ins (PHEVs) are very desirable, and for many they&#039;ll need that security for a while until EV charging stations are in every gas station. But PHEVs should be viewed as a step towards REVs (Range Extending Vehicles) and/or EVs.

Volt and PHEV Priuses can peacefully co-exist with Nissan EVs for at least another decade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nissan will join Tesla, ZENN, ZAP, Phoenix and Think building EVs (Electric Vehicles) over the next 4 years. It&#8217;s unlikely anyone will produce enough volume to saturate the market anytime soon, so there&#8217;s plenty of room in the pool. It&#8217;s about danged time we started getting factory EVs. Perhaps Toyota will revive and rejuvenate it&#8217;s RAV4 EV with Li-ion batteries.</p>
<p>Plug-ins (PHEVs) are very desirable, and for many they&#8217;ll need that security for a while until EV charging stations are in every gas station. But PHEVs should be viewed as a step towards REVs (Range Extending Vehicles) and/or EVs.</p>
<p>Volt and PHEV Priuses can peacefully co-exist with Nissan EVs for at least another decade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerry Cherry</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/05/13/chevy-volt-knocked-aside-by-bullish-competitor-nissan/comment-page-1/#comment-90250</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry Cherry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/05/13/chevy-volt-knocked-aside-by-bullish-competitor-nissan/#comment-90250</guid>
		<description>Matt Jensen obviously doesn&#039;t know much about GM&#039;s E-Flex platform, nor anything about the three or more models that will shortly follow the VOLT. This article is a piece of lazy journalism.
Nor is the simple EV_1 type limited capability EV that osn is putting out there any match for the long range, practical capabilities of the Volt and its siblings. The EV Ghosn is building was shown to be ipractical 15 years ago when it came out as an EV-1, Toyota Rav4 or Honda EV, all dreadful failures because of range limitations and excessive recharge times. Nissan is building a fleet of can&#039;t-do vehicles that will give EVs a bad name all over again. Another blunder by Ghosn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt Jensen obviously doesn&#8217;t know much about GM&#8217;s E-Flex platform, nor anything about the three or more models that will shortly follow the VOLT. This article is a piece of lazy journalism.<br />
Nor is the simple EV_1 type limited capability EV that osn is putting out there any match for the long range, practical capabilities of the Volt and its siblings. The EV Ghosn is building was shown to be ipractical 15 years ago when it came out as an EV-1, Toyota Rav4 or Honda EV, all dreadful failures because of range limitations and excessive recharge times. Nissan is building a fleet of can&#8217;t-do vehicles that will give EVs a bad name all over again. Another blunder by Ghosn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chevy Volt Guy</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/05/13/chevy-volt-knocked-aside-by-bullish-competitor-nissan/comment-page-1/#comment-90236</link>
		<dc:creator>Chevy Volt Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/05/13/chevy-volt-knocked-aside-by-bullish-competitor-nissan/#comment-90236</guid>
		<description>I think the new A123 technology they are putting into the Volt is a great step in the right direction.  We need more vendors to supply batteries and other components if we ever expect hybrids to be affordable.

Learn more about the volt at http://www.chevy-volt.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the new A123 technology they are putting into the Volt is a great step in the right direction.  We need more vendors to supply batteries and other components if we ever expect hybrids to be affordable.</p>
<p>Learn more about the volt at <a href="http://www.chevy-volt.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.chevy-volt.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

