<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 40 best free CMS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/</link>
	<description>Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Susan J</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/comment-page-1/#comment-212557</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/#comment-212557</guid>
		<description>What about Expression Engine?  They&#039;re a great CMS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Expression Engine?  They&#8217;re a great CMS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Webber</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/comment-page-1/#comment-157781</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Webber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 03:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/#comment-157781</guid>
		<description>Demos &amp; Docs for 100 best open source content management systems :

http://gplpedia.com/Select/Cms1.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Demos &amp; Docs for 100 best open source content management systems :</p>
<p><a href="http://gplpedia.com/Select/Cms1.html" rel="nofollow">http://gplpedia.com/Select/Cms1.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DigitalMofo</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/comment-page-1/#comment-153069</link>
		<dc:creator>DigitalMofo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/#comment-153069</guid>
		<description>sorry bout the double post. your captcha confused me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry bout the double post. your captcha confused me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DigitalMofo</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/comment-page-1/#comment-153068</link>
		<dc:creator>DigitalMofo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/#comment-153068</guid>
		<description>Started a small blog with wordpress. A nightmare, version correlations, unsigned plugins with full access to core db, wp writing into the admin part.. 
Might switch to Joomla, even though it has its downs as well, but this is how it goes when one is to lazy to build something from scratch.

I couldn&#039;t find Typo3 on your list, which is been said to be among the most powerfull cms available. Guess the not very appealing look of the raw version is the reason for the lack of credits that it deserves</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Started a small blog with wordpress. A nightmare, version correlations, unsigned plugins with full access to core db, wp writing into the admin part..<br />
Might switch to Joomla, even though it has its downs as well, but this is how it goes when one is to lazy to build something from scratch.</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t find Typo3 on your list, which is been said to be among the most powerfull cms available. Guess the not very appealing look of the raw version is the reason for the lack of credits that it deserves</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DigitalMofo</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/comment-page-1/#comment-153066</link>
		<dc:creator>DigitalMofo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/#comment-153066</guid>
		<description>I recently started a small blog with wordpress and i totally dislike it. Any plugin with access to core db, version correlations and so on. 

I will go for joomla, even though a code review didnt convinced me either, but lacking of time to build a cms from scratch.

Typo3.org is often mentioned as the most secure and flexible cms. but it&#039;s raw, not appealing look might be the reason that it did not get yet the credits it supposed to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently started a small blog with wordpress and i totally dislike it. Any plugin with access to core db, version correlations and so on. </p>
<p>I will go for joomla, even though a code review didnt convinced me either, but lacking of time to build a cms from scratch.</p>
<p>Typo3.org is often mentioned as the most secure and flexible cms. but it&#8217;s raw, not appealing look might be the reason that it did not get yet the credits it supposed to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mandar</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/comment-page-1/#comment-151284</link>
		<dc:creator>Mandar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/#comment-151284</guid>
		<description>I have a blog by Blogspot. Should I go for CMS or it is OK to live with third party hosted blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a blog by Blogspot. Should I go for CMS or it is OK to live with third party hosted blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maternity Clothes</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/comment-page-1/#comment-142495</link>
		<dc:creator>Maternity Clothes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/#comment-142495</guid>
		<description>how could you have missed CMSMS, fantastically simple CMS Made Simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how could you have missed CMSMS, fantastically simple CMS Made Simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duh</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/comment-page-1/#comment-138430</link>
		<dc:creator>duh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/#comment-138430</guid>
		<description>Compare #24 and #28 and you know how much proof-reading this article has had before it got published.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compare #24 and #28 and you know how much proof-reading this article has had before it got published.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/comment-page-1/#comment-133997</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/#comment-133997</guid>
		<description>@Ralph

did you even read the article? this is about content management systems not operating systems....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ralph</p>
<p>did you even read the article? this is about content management systems not operating systems&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/comment-page-1/#comment-132410</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 03:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/09/01/top-40-open-source-content-management-systems-cms/#comment-132410</guid>
		<description>1. Ubuntu .... Installs on almost all computers, can be setup for wireless, has extensive free applications built in. Can run and do mostly all needed internet, graphical, word processing, text message, video, audio applications. Needs no mindless and confusing serial numbers. No online &quot;activation&quot; needed. 

2. Xubuntu... Installs on lower end computers with less RAM and CPU requirements. Same funstionality as above.

3. Absolute Linux ... Installs on older and newer computers with a host of great applications.

4. DSL Linux...will run on older Pentium I and even 486 computers with 64 MB RAM or less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Ubuntu &#8230;. Installs on almost all computers, can be setup for wireless, has extensive free applications built in. Can run and do mostly all needed internet, graphical, word processing, text message, video, audio applications. Needs no mindless and confusing serial numbers. No online &#8220;activation&#8221; needed. </p>
<p>2. Xubuntu&#8230; Installs on lower end computers with less RAM and CPU requirements. Same funstionality as above.</p>
<p>3. Absolute Linux &#8230; Installs on older and newer computers with a host of great applications.</p>
<p>4. DSL Linux&#8230;will run on older Pentium I and even 486 computers with 64 MB RAM or less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
