<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ATI keeping AMD&#8217;s sinking ship afloat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2008/10/08/ati-keeping-amds-sinking-ship-afloat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/10/08/ati-keeping-amds-sinking-ship-afloat/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steel</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/10/08/ati-keeping-amds-sinking-ship-afloat/comment-page-1/#comment-182618</link>
		<dc:creator>Steel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/10/08/ati-keeping-amds-sinking-ship-afloat/#comment-182618</guid>
		<description>AMD is much better performing than INtel on all points. Sorry mates. You have to agree with that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMD is much better performing than INtel on all points. Sorry mates. You have to agree with that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nuker</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/10/08/ati-keeping-amds-sinking-ship-afloat/comment-page-1/#comment-144864</link>
		<dc:creator>nuker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/10/08/ati-keeping-amds-sinking-ship-afloat/#comment-144864</guid>
		<description>I agree with fwfsfgeaf, you your viewing point is flawed; ATI is responsible for so many of AMDs tremendous losses the last years, not to mention they paid a few billions more than ATI was worth resulting in a $1.6 billion USD net loss Q1 2007 (or was it Q2? I don&#039;t remember). I think AMDs shares are worth less today than what ATIs were at the time of purchase. Soon when deneb is released, AMD will be able to compete against the core 2s and get some profits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with fwfsfgeaf, you your viewing point is flawed; ATI is responsible for so many of AMDs tremendous losses the last years, not to mention they paid a few billions more than ATI was worth resulting in a $1.6 billion USD net loss Q1 2007 (or was it Q2? I don&#8217;t remember). I think AMDs shares are worth less today than what ATIs were at the time of purchase. Soon when deneb is released, AMD will be able to compete against the core 2s and get some profits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fwfsfgeaf</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/10/08/ati-keeping-amds-sinking-ship-afloat/comment-page-1/#comment-140391</link>
		<dc:creator>fwfsfgeaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/10/08/ati-keeping-amds-sinking-ship-afloat/#comment-140391</guid>
		<description>&quot;it should likely be grateful for its ATI purchase.&quot;

I disagree.  AMD blew 5 billion on that purchase, and right now they&#039;re 5 billion in the hole.  Their Fusion hasn&#039;t worked out yet, so what has ATI contributed to AMD other than a massive debt that led to this spinoff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it should likely be grateful for its ATI purchase.&#8221;</p>
<p>I disagree.  AMD blew 5 billion on that purchase, and right now they&#8217;re 5 billion in the hole.  Their Fusion hasn&#8217;t worked out yet, so what has ATI contributed to AMD other than a massive debt that led to this spinoff?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

