<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What a McCain win could mean for technology and science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2008/11/01/what-a-mccain-win-could-mean-for-technology-and-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/11/01/what-a-mccain-win-could-mean-for-technology-and-science/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe the Plumber</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/11/01/what-a-mccain-win-could-mean-for-technology-and-science/comment-page-1/#comment-144138</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe the Plumber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 05:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=8122#comment-144138</guid>
		<description>Ken, DavidB, you two are idiots.  Get your heads out of your @sses before I use my plunger to do it for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, DavidB, you two are idiots.  Get your heads out of your @sses before I use my plunger to do it for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/11/01/what-a-mccain-win-could-mean-for-technology-and-science/comment-page-1/#comment-143982</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 18:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=8122#comment-143982</guid>
		<description>One of the biggest piles of crap I have read in years. First election? If not, I fear for our country.

One Carter in a lifetime is enough. Take away the illogical &quot;Eight years&quot; and all the Mcsame stuff is Political Science for 2 year olds. If Gore had won I guess 9/11, the dotbomb crash, Katerina wouldn&#039;t have happened. Of course President Gore would have no doubt tightened the criteria for low income home loans.

Suddenly, making an inhospitable environment  for business and closing &quot;loopholes&quot; is a good environment for job creation. Raise capital gains tax so the people with money to invest do it elsewhere.

 Funny how when Bush was running on tax breaks it was going to drop us into a Depression. Remember, he was going to be the first President to lose net jobs since Hoover? Strange coincidence he was also the last President to raise taxes and impose a surcharge during a poor economy.

 Believe that the $500 or $1000 Obama plans to hand out to people earned from someone elses work is going &quot;Save their homes, send their child to college and ensure a comfortable retirement.&quot;

 I propose a contest to test the candidates on areas they are weak in. McCain has knowledge in flying Military Aircraft, while Obama is better versed in computer use. Let&#039;s put them to the test by letting Obama land a jet and McCain do a web search. Obama first.

I can&#039;t wait to see an Obama administration with a Reid-Polosi Congress. Do yourself a favor and do a search for speeches by Presidential candidates from the non-incumbent Party. You are going to see the same basic points. Change the culture in Washington. Take it back from special interests. Cut waste. Be bipartisan. Blah..Blah. It&#039;s only new if your have a poor understanding of what historically common themes are universally spouted by out of power Partys.  All Obama knows how to do is inflame his base when he is criticized.

Getting crap about not knowing the situation on the ground in Iraq because you haven&#039;t been there for two years? People are saying you&#039;re too inexperienced in foreign affairs?

Spend ten minutes with the troops, like it was busy work, and play head of state in an incredibly egotistical JFK imitation to throngs of delirious Europeans. Never mind they can&#039;t vote. Or consider what your action does to inflame anti-US sentiment if you should lose the election. I&#039;m watching him bash Fox in a many of his speeches and trying to imagine what he could possibly be thinking. His base shake in ecstasy when he does it , just like his Euro-tour. 

 The problem is, Senator you already have those votes. It&#039;s the millions of people in that you need you are ridiculing. 

 You computer is generating a reality distortion field. As far as I can tell, Bush didn&#039;t sign NAFTA or the DMCA. Or let Microsoft off easy. Gore/Clinton had no energy policy or anything on climate change. Clinton treated terrorism as a law enforcement event. Bin Laden figured a few missile lobs and posturing was all that would happen, speaking of failed policies.

Stop mindlessly spitting out Presidential Idol campaign rubbish. If you take all the stupid McCain=Bush stuff and the impossible &quot;prove a negative&quot; about failed policies, he has nothing. Ignorance of economics and a public that reads less than a book a year, who have no idea who the speaker of the house is, and who think cotton candy, rehashed class warfare slogans are new and  fresh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the biggest piles of crap I have read in years. First election? If not, I fear for our country.</p>
<p>One Carter in a lifetime is enough. Take away the illogical &#8220;Eight years&#8221; and all the Mcsame stuff is Political Science for 2 year olds. If Gore had won I guess 9/11, the dotbomb crash, Katerina wouldn&#8217;t have happened. Of course President Gore would have no doubt tightened the criteria for low income home loans.</p>
<p>Suddenly, making an inhospitable environment  for business and closing &#8220;loopholes&#8221; is a good environment for job creation. Raise capital gains tax so the people with money to invest do it elsewhere.</p>
<p> Funny how when Bush was running on tax breaks it was going to drop us into a Depression. Remember, he was going to be the first President to lose net jobs since Hoover? Strange coincidence he was also the last President to raise taxes and impose a surcharge during a poor economy.</p>
<p> Believe that the $500 or $1000 Obama plans to hand out to people earned from someone elses work is going &#8220;Save their homes, send their child to college and ensure a comfortable retirement.&#8221;</p>
<p> I propose a contest to test the candidates on areas they are weak in. McCain has knowledge in flying Military Aircraft, while Obama is better versed in computer use. Let&#8217;s put them to the test by letting Obama land a jet and McCain do a web search. Obama first.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait to see an Obama administration with a Reid-Polosi Congress. Do yourself a favor and do a search for speeches by Presidential candidates from the non-incumbent Party. You are going to see the same basic points. Change the culture in Washington. Take it back from special interests. Cut waste. Be bipartisan. Blah..Blah. It&#8217;s only new if your have a poor understanding of what historically common themes are universally spouted by out of power Partys.  All Obama knows how to do is inflame his base when he is criticized.</p>
<p>Getting crap about not knowing the situation on the ground in Iraq because you haven&#8217;t been there for two years? People are saying you&#8217;re too inexperienced in foreign affairs?</p>
<p>Spend ten minutes with the troops, like it was busy work, and play head of state in an incredibly egotistical JFK imitation to throngs of delirious Europeans. Never mind they can&#8217;t vote. Or consider what your action does to inflame anti-US sentiment if you should lose the election. I&#8217;m watching him bash Fox in a many of his speeches and trying to imagine what he could possibly be thinking. His base shake in ecstasy when he does it , just like his Euro-tour. </p>
<p> The problem is, Senator you already have those votes. It&#8217;s the millions of people in that you need you are ridiculing. </p>
<p> You computer is generating a reality distortion field. As far as I can tell, Bush didn&#8217;t sign NAFTA or the DMCA. Or let Microsoft off easy. Gore/Clinton had no energy policy or anything on climate change. Clinton treated terrorism as a law enforcement event. Bin Laden figured a few missile lobs and posturing was all that would happen, speaking of failed policies.</p>
<p>Stop mindlessly spitting out Presidential Idol campaign rubbish. If you take all the stupid McCain=Bush stuff and the impossible &#8220;prove a negative&#8221; about failed policies, he has nothing. Ignorance of economics and a public that reads less than a book a year, who have no idea who the speaker of the house is, and who think cotton candy, rehashed class warfare slogans are new and  fresh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/11/01/what-a-mccain-win-could-mean-for-technology-and-science/comment-page-1/#comment-143861</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 15:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=8122#comment-143861</guid>
		<description>Pretty clear the leftist leanings here at Blorge. Can any of you write an OBJECTIVE article?

Its clearly not any chief executive&#039;s (or President&#039;s) role to make tech policy. Their job is to provide leadership, something your darling has shown absolutely NONE of in his political life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty clear the leftist leanings here at Blorge. Can any of you write an OBJECTIVE article?</p>
<p>Its clearly not any chief executive&#8217;s (or President&#8217;s) role to make tech policy. Their job is to provide leadership, something your darling has shown absolutely NONE of in his political life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

