<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Netbooks &#8211; Arrington misses the point, Intel the plot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2008/11/29/netbooks-arrington-misses-the-point-intel-the-plot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/11/29/netbooks-arrington-misses-the-point-intel-the-plot/</link>
	<description>Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/11/29/netbooks-arrington-misses-the-point-intel-the-plot/comment-page-1/#comment-149690</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/11/29/netbooks-arrington-misses-the-point-intel-the-plot/#comment-149690</guid>
		<description>I disagree that a Blackberry or iPhone has far more utility. The physical screen size on either one blows compared to a netbook. People that disagree are like eunuchs rationalizing the benefits of being a harem guard. Yeah, there are worst jobs but....

 The main issue I have with netbooks is an acceptable one is so close in price to a 13&quot; or 15&quot; laptop they don&#039;t make fiscal sense.

$199- 10&quot; screen, gig of RAM and 20 gig SSD would be great. The whole Netbook craze started out because the price was unreal. $299 for a laptop? When a decent laptop was more than $800, excellent. Now $395 when a decent email, surf laptop is $50-$100 more? Not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree that a Blackberry or iPhone has far more utility. The physical screen size on either one blows compared to a netbook. People that disagree are like eunuchs rationalizing the benefits of being a harem guard. Yeah, there are worst jobs but&#8230;.</p>
<p> The main issue I have with netbooks is an acceptable one is so close in price to a 13&#8243; or 15&#8243; laptop they don&#8217;t make fiscal sense.</p>
<p>$199- 10&#8243; screen, gig of RAM and 20 gig SSD would be great. The whole Netbook craze started out because the price was unreal. $299 for a laptop? When a decent laptop was more than $800, excellent. Now $395 when a decent email, surf laptop is $50-$100 more? Not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/11/29/netbooks-arrington-misses-the-point-intel-the-plot/comment-page-1/#comment-149423</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2008/11/29/netbooks-arrington-misses-the-point-intel-the-plot/#comment-149423</guid>
		<description>Sorry, agree with Arrington. They&#039;re useless. A Blackberry or iPhone has far more utility for the same or equal price. Every &quot;netbook&quot; I&#039;ve tried has been essentially useless coming from my past of using a full fledged laptop for going on 20 years, and I find myself agreeing with Michael that a snartphone is far better at filling the need for on the go utility than any netbook out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, agree with Arrington. They&#8217;re useless. A Blackberry or iPhone has far more utility for the same or equal price. Every &#8220;netbook&#8221; I&#8217;ve tried has been essentially useless coming from my past of using a full fledged laptop for going on 20 years, and I find myself agreeing with Michael that a snartphone is far better at filling the need for on the go utility than any netbook out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
