Comments on: Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox neck and neck on JavaScript http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/12/10/google-chrome-and-mozilla-firefox-neck-and-neck-on-javascript/ Top Technology news Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:30:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: web development Dubai http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/12/10/google-chrome-and-mozilla-firefox-neck-and-neck-on-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-174720 web development Dubai Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:14:05 +0000 http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/12/10/google-chrome-and-mozilla-firefox-neck-and-neck-on-javascript/#comment-174720 Thanks for a comparison post. However, as always, I will always try to be blunt regarding open source vs. open source comparisons. As stated in the google chrome page, the /dev team integrated features from Webkit(apple) and Gecko(mozilla) means that chrome is not some super NEW browser but rather an all new improvement and innovation that maximizes the importance of being online. This is further supported by their “Why we built a web browser”(rephrase mine) page. Anyways, since it’s open source, we can expect a lot of improvements for the open source community. Though I think Chrome would be a good substitute for xubuntu or any other linux distro that uses lightweight Desktop Enviros (i.e. xfce) Regarding the “flash” problem, it shouldn’t be one way. Flash developers must try to improve their memory usage as well as compatibility. Regards all, Reply Thanks for a comparison post. However, as always, I will always try to be blunt regarding open source vs. open source comparisons. As stated in the google chrome page, the /dev team integrated features from Webkit(apple) and Gecko(mozilla) means that chrome is not some super NEW browser but rather an all new improvement and innovation that maximizes the importance of being online. This is further supported by their “Why we built a web browser”(rephrase mine) page.

Anyways, since it’s open source, we can expect a lot of improvements for the open source community. Though I think Chrome would be a good substitute for xubuntu or any other linux distro that uses lightweight Desktop Enviros (i.e. xfce)

Regarding the “flash” problem, it shouldn’t be one way. Flash developers must try to improve their memory usage as well as compatibility.

Regards all,
Reply

]]>