<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s mobile IE6 still a poor competitor to Opera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2008/12/21/microsofts-mobile-ie6-still-a-poor-competitor-to-opera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/12/21/microsofts-mobile-ie6-still-a-poor-competitor-to-opera/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/12/21/microsofts-mobile-ie6-still-a-poor-competitor-to-opera/comment-page-1/#comment-153304</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2008/12/21/microsofts-mobile-ie6-still-a-poor-competitor-to-opera/#comment-153304</guid>
		<description>Same old shortcomings - I agree.  You can check out my thoughts here: http://www.techurbia.com/2008/12/new-ie-mobile-based-on-ie-6-really-4.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same old shortcomings &#8211; I agree.  You can check out my thoughts here: <a href="http://www.techurbia.com/2008/12/new-ie-mobile-based-on-ie-6-really-4.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.techurbia.com/2008/12/new-ie-mobile-based-on-ie-6-really-4.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

