http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/01/08/ufo-damages-wind-turbine-aliens-not-alternative-energy-fans/ Technology news Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:29:39 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/01/08/ufo-damages-wind-turbine-aliens-not-alternative-energy-fans/comment-page-1/#comment-158551 john Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:53:50 +0000 http://tech.blorge.com/?p=11330#comment-158551 knowledge is key knowledge is key

]]> http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/01/08/ufo-damages-wind-turbine-aliens-not-alternative-energy-fans/comment-page-1/#comment-155332 Glenn Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:01:08 +0000 http://tech.blorge.com/?p=11330#comment-155332 From what I can remember of ball lightening, it would have been a long lightening bolt, suddenly changing direction and forming a ball for a very short (a second or 2 maybe?) and then striking at whatever. Ball lightening is VERY rare and doesn't account for the multiple glowing orbs reported. Also the lightening bolt attached to the ball would have been very visible so it would have been recognised as ball lightening. From what I can remember of ball lightening, it would have been a long lightening bolt, suddenly changing direction and forming a ball for a very short (a second or 2 maybe?) and then striking at whatever. Ball lightening is VERY rare and doesn’t account for the multiple glowing orbs reported. Also the lightening bolt attached to the ball would have been very visible so it would have been recognised as ball lightening.

]]> http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/01/08/ufo-damages-wind-turbine-aliens-not-alternative-energy-fans/comment-page-1/#comment-155193 Freddy Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:39:45 +0000 http://tech.blorge.com/?p=11330#comment-155193 Perhaps it could have been Ball Lightning? Perhaps it could have been Ball Lightning?

]]>