<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: British government wants Broadband for all by 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2009/01/16/british-government-wants-broadband-for-all-by-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/01/16/british-government-wants-broadband-for-all-by-2012/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveBG</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/01/16/british-government-wants-broadband-for-all-by-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-156204</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveBG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 21:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=11650#comment-156204</guid>
		<description>&quot;your need to constantly show your I-hate-Bush-but-Obama-is-God fixation&quot;

Jebus H Ken, what the f**k are you on about?

You quoted me so I gues you&#039;re referring to me but if you actually looked you&#039;d see I did not once mention &quot;Police state&quot;.

Neither did I express hatred for Bush. 

I made a comment about &quot;right-wing Bush&quot; (which he is) and his beginnings as a supposed &#039;compassionate conservative&#039; where not everything came down to a narrow economic perspective and a broader social awareness was supposedly going to be genuinely considered.

I certainly do not consider Obama &quot;God&quot;, even if I do expect him to be a better US President (why are people on the right-wing making that sort of ludicrous comment? 
I&#039;ve noticed it appearing pretty frequently.) 

Defensive, much?!

LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;your need to constantly show your I-hate-Bush-but-Obama-is-God fixation&#8221;</p>
<p>Jebus H Ken, what the f**k are you on about?</p>
<p>You quoted me so I gues you&#8217;re referring to me but if you actually looked you&#8217;d see I did not once mention &#8220;Police state&#8221;.</p>
<p>Neither did I express hatred for Bush. </p>
<p>I made a comment about &#8220;right-wing Bush&#8221; (which he is) and his beginnings as a supposed &#8216;compassionate conservative&#8217; where not everything came down to a narrow economic perspective and a broader social awareness was supposedly going to be genuinely considered.</p>
<p>I certainly do not consider Obama &#8220;God&#8221;, even if I do expect him to be a better US President (why are people on the right-wing making that sort of ludicrous comment?<br />
I&#8217;ve noticed it appearing pretty frequently.) </p>
<p>Defensive, much?!</p>
<p>LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/01/16/british-government-wants-broadband-for-all-by-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-156202</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=11650#comment-156202</guid>
		<description>&quot;Even right-wing Rep Bush had a similar theme with one or two of his ideas (or at least in his PR) ‘no-one left behind’ wasn’t it?&quot;

Will your need to constantly show your I-hate-Bush-but-Obama-is-God fixation for a country you don&#039;t live in or know much about, being a police state and all, after next week?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Even right-wing Rep Bush had a similar theme with one or two of his ideas (or at least in his PR) ‘no-one left behind’ wasn’t it?&#8221;</p>
<p>Will your need to constantly show your I-hate-Bush-but-Obama-is-God fixation for a country you don&#8217;t live in or know much about, being a police state and all, after next week?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firetaw</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/01/16/british-government-wants-broadband-for-all-by-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-156177</link>
		<dc:creator>firetaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=11650#comment-156177</guid>
		<description>here in canada my parents live 3 km from the citie yet they arnt allowed highspeed. you are saying move to the citie but what about the people who are just about the citie limits who arnt allowed high speed yet some places in the country side have high speed because there was a demand from younger folks who requested it. yet my parents are old and they dont know what to do with a computer and they live around old people also that doesnt know what broadband means. if this passes and works then more countrys will follow meaning someday my parents will finaly get some sort of high speed. i will be able to see my parents everyday via video chat or even with skype. so dont you think this is a good thing and eventualy replace the phone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here in canada my parents live 3 km from the citie yet they arnt allowed highspeed. you are saying move to the citie but what about the people who are just about the citie limits who arnt allowed high speed yet some places in the country side have high speed because there was a demand from younger folks who requested it. yet my parents are old and they dont know what to do with a computer and they live around old people also that doesnt know what broadband means. if this passes and works then more countrys will follow meaning someday my parents will finaly get some sort of high speed. i will be able to see my parents everyday via video chat or even with skype. so dont you think this is a good thing and eventualy replace the phone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveBG</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/01/16/british-government-wants-broadband-for-all-by-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-156170</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveBG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=11650#comment-156170</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a fine policy.

This is simply a matter of the minimum standard being set.
No-one will be a on less than 2mb connection no matter wherever you are in the UK, even on the very fringes.

Meanwhile the majority in the UK (by the end of 2010) will be on C21N tech ensuring that the current &#039;up to 8mb&#039; connection most can have rises to an &#039;up to 24mb&#039; connection.

(and this is under plans that were in place before the coming recession, the major capital public spending programs the UK Gov - like Govs all around the world - is instituting will undoubtedly go further in improving the UK&#039;s internet infrastructure) 

Excellent.

Even right-wing Rep Bush had a similar theme with one or two of his ideas (or at least in his PR) &#039;no-one left behind&#039; wasn&#039;t it?

Commercial freedom is one thing but there is also an element of social responsibility which wider society demands too.
It could be you, your parents or your kids that end up on the fringes.

(btw Roger Wilcocks, the UK Gov once did build and pay for the networks, then the Thatcher Gov sold what &#039;we&#039; the people used to own back to us in a privatisation that let the financial institutions get hold of what was once ours at a knock-down price.
The least they can do is maintain a degree of responsibility towards the people from whom they now profit so handsomely.

.....and if you seriously imagine the present Labour Gov in the UK is remotely close to being &#039;socialist&#039; I suggest you go and find out what the word really means instead of casually throwing about laughably inappropriate terms.).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a fine policy.</p>
<p>This is simply a matter of the minimum standard being set.<br />
No-one will be a on less than 2mb connection no matter wherever you are in the UK, even on the very fringes.</p>
<p>Meanwhile the majority in the UK (by the end of 2010) will be on C21N tech ensuring that the current &#8216;up to 8mb&#8217; connection most can have rises to an &#8216;up to 24mb&#8217; connection.</p>
<p>(and this is under plans that were in place before the coming recession, the major capital public spending programs the UK Gov &#8211; like Govs all around the world &#8211; is instituting will undoubtedly go further in improving the UK&#8217;s internet infrastructure) </p>
<p>Excellent.</p>
<p>Even right-wing Rep Bush had a similar theme with one or two of his ideas (or at least in his PR) &#8216;no-one left behind&#8217; wasn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Commercial freedom is one thing but there is also an element of social responsibility which wider society demands too.<br />
It could be you, your parents or your kids that end up on the fringes.</p>
<p>(btw Roger Wilcocks, the UK Gov once did build and pay for the networks, then the Thatcher Gov sold what &#8216;we&#8217; the people used to own back to us in a privatisation that let the financial institutions get hold of what was once ours at a knock-down price.<br />
The least they can do is maintain a degree of responsibility towards the people from whom they now profit so handsomely.</p>
<p>&#8230;..and if you seriously imagine the present Labour Gov in the UK is remotely close to being &#8216;socialist&#8217; I suggest you go and find out what the word really means instead of casually throwing about laughably inappropriate terms.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidB</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/01/16/british-government-wants-broadband-for-all-by-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-156165</link>
		<dc:creator>davidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=11650#comment-156165</guid>
		<description>Can you post about practically anything without contradicting yourself any more? You were supposedly in favor of got leaving us alone but I guess not so much any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you post about practically anything without contradicting yourself any more? You were supposedly in favor of got leaving us alone but I guess not so much any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Wilcocks</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/01/16/british-government-wants-broadband-for-all-by-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-156126</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Wilcocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=11650#comment-156126</guid>
		<description>Darian, you don&#039;t need to be rude, but you do have a point. If you want fast Internet, move to the city where you can get fast Internet connection. Why should companies and their shareholders subsidize commercially unviable networks just so some socialist government somewhere can get more votes? If it&#039;s so important for everyone to have fast Internet service, the Government can build it&#039;s own network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darian, you don&#8217;t need to be rude, but you do have a point. If you want fast Internet, move to the city where you can get fast Internet connection. Why should companies and their shareholders subsidize commercially unviable networks just so some socialist government somewhere can get more votes? If it&#8217;s so important for everyone to have fast Internet service, the Government can build it&#8217;s own network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darian</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/01/16/british-government-wants-broadband-for-all-by-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-156102</link>
		<dc:creator>Darian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=11650#comment-156102</guid>
		<description>But Dave, remember you are all for freedom and stuff , by rights you should be fighting this, Not a free world if the government makes a private telecom company have a minimum service to everyone is it. Yet you seem to be for it,
Again your an idiot ! 
Your are contradicting all your past blogs,
You should just move to america and be done with it.
 F****n idiot,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Dave, remember you are all for freedom and stuff , by rights you should be fighting this, Not a free world if the government makes a private telecom company have a minimum service to everyone is it. Yet you seem to be for it,<br />
Again your an idiot !<br />
Your are contradicting all your past blogs,<br />
You should just move to america and be done with it.<br />
 F****n idiot,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

