<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia is doomed whatever it does&#8230; or not as the case may be</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2009/02/13/wikipedia-is-doomed-whatever-it-does-or-not-as-the-case-may-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/02/13/wikipedia-is-doomed-whatever-it-does-or-not-as-the-case-may-be/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/02/13/wikipedia-is-doomed-whatever-it-does-or-not-as-the-case-may-be/comment-page-1/#comment-159039</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=12768#comment-159039</guid>
		<description>It is a common joke in my business (it says so on Wikipedia so it must be true). I love the site myself, its often my starting point if I&#039;m bored and caught up in my RSS reader. But if Wikipedia wants a future of relevance, they need to solve this conundrum. Maybe crowdsourcing (voting up/down edits before they are inserted as &quot;main body&quot; text?) has got to be part of the solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a common joke in my business (it says so on Wikipedia so it must be true). I love the site myself, its often my starting point if I&#8217;m bored and caught up in my RSS reader. But if Wikipedia wants a future of relevance, they need to solve this conundrum. Maybe crowdsourcing (voting up/down edits before they are inserted as &#8220;main body&#8221; text?) has got to be part of the solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/02/13/wikipedia-is-doomed-whatever-it-does-or-not-as-the-case-may-be/comment-page-1/#comment-159040</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=12768#comment-159040</guid>
		<description>It is a common joke in my business (it says so on Wikipedia so it must be true). I love the site myself, its often my starting point if I&#039;m bored and caught up in my RSS reader. But if Wikipedia wants a future of relevance, they need to solve this conundrum. Maybe crowdsourcing (voting up/down edits before they are inserted as &quot;main body&quot; text?) has got to be part of the solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a common joke in my business (it says so on Wikipedia so it must be true). I love the site myself, its often my starting point if I&#8217;m bored and caught up in my RSS reader. But if Wikipedia wants a future of relevance, they need to solve this conundrum. Maybe crowdsourcing (voting up/down edits before they are inserted as &#8220;main body&#8221; text?) has got to be part of the solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

