<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook users hate Twitter-style redesign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2009/03/19/facebook-users-hate-twitter-style-redesign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/03/19/facebook-users-hate-twitter-style-redesign/</link>
	<description>Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/03/19/facebook-users-hate-twitter-style-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-165853</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=14078#comment-165853</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not the design people are pissed about so much as them taking away VIEWING OPTIONS such as that Martin describes -- and reducing space and timeline of upcoming events/birthdays for that HORRIBLE Highlights crap with the blended ads. Their ad placement was friendlier, easier to read and didn&#039;t sleazily mingle with my personal messages like they do now.

Furthermore - making status updates blend in visually with other types of posts is blinding if you have more than a few dozen very active friends.

It&#039;s a far less useful tool now -- home page especially.

Less useful and far less clean -- so pretty means squat.

This is a fine opportunity for some other social network who understand the ease of keeping in touch, seeing useful info at a glance and presenting ads in a way that&#039;s engaging but not FORCED, sleazily interwoven too much in your personal friends&#039; stuff.

We &quot;get&quot; you gotta keep the lights on and pay the bills like we do, but this isn&#039;t the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not the design people are pissed about so much as them taking away VIEWING OPTIONS such as that Martin describes &#8212; and reducing space and timeline of upcoming events/birthdays for that HORRIBLE Highlights crap with the blended ads. Their ad placement was friendlier, easier to read and didn&#8217;t sleazily mingle with my personal messages like they do now.</p>
<p>Furthermore &#8211; making status updates blend in visually with other types of posts is blinding if you have more than a few dozen very active friends.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a far less useful tool now &#8212; home page especially.</p>
<p>Less useful and far less clean &#8212; so pretty means squat.</p>
<p>This is a fine opportunity for some other social network who understand the ease of keeping in touch, seeing useful info at a glance and presenting ads in a way that&#8217;s engaging but not FORCED, sleazily interwoven too much in your personal friends&#8217; stuff.</p>
<p>We &#8220;get&#8221; you gotta keep the lights on and pay the bills like we do, but this isn&#8217;t the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/03/19/facebook-users-hate-twitter-style-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-165813</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=14078#comment-165813</guid>
		<description>Amen, Steve--and now you can&#039;t hide blurbs on your stream from applications; you must choose to hide *all* &quot;stories&quot; from a given friend, or accept them all. That&#039;s ridiculous. I really enjoy reading my friends&#039; status updates, for instance, but I don&#039;t care at all about whatever quiz they&#039;ve just taken or whether or not they&#039;ve thrown a sheep at their third cousin using superpoke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, Steve&#8211;and now you can&#8217;t hide blurbs on your stream from applications; you must choose to hide *all* &#8220;stories&#8221; from a given friend, or accept them all. That&#8217;s ridiculous. I really enjoy reading my friends&#8217; status updates, for instance, but I don&#8217;t care at all about whatever quiz they&#8217;ve just taken or whether or not they&#8217;ve thrown a sheep at their third cousin using superpoke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lafreniere</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/03/19/facebook-users-hate-twitter-style-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-165777</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lafreniere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=14078#comment-165777</guid>
		<description>&quot;Visually more attractive&quot;??? Everyone I&#039;ve asked is disgusted, especially about the profile pages. And the general consensus among my graphic designer friends is that FB clearly didn&#039;t consult anyone in their field. &quot;It&#039;s the equivalent of the flyers my mom does in TextEdit for her church&#039;s bake sale,&quot; was how one put it.

With the old version, I used to take care to provide large images on a note that I wanted folks to pay attention to. Whenever I put up a new album of photos, the first one uploaded would appear on the profile nice and large, as a way to announce the fact. Text sizes made sense relative to the sorts of posts they were connected to.

Now everything is jammed into three type sizes and one image size, with the repetition ad nauseum of oversized avatars in rounded corners (rounded corners?? hey, welcome to 1994).

If fact the utter ugliness and confusion of the profile page is why I&#039;ve hardly posted anything since the change. Today I actually considered using all caps for the more important posts, just so they&#039;ll stand out above the general visual racket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Visually more attractive&#8221;??? Everyone I&#8217;ve asked is disgusted, especially about the profile pages. And the general consensus among my graphic designer friends is that FB clearly didn&#8217;t consult anyone in their field. &#8220;It&#8217;s the equivalent of the flyers my mom does in TextEdit for her church&#8217;s bake sale,&#8221; was how one put it.</p>
<p>With the old version, I used to take care to provide large images on a note that I wanted folks to pay attention to. Whenever I put up a new album of photos, the first one uploaded would appear on the profile nice and large, as a way to announce the fact. Text sizes made sense relative to the sorts of posts they were connected to.</p>
<p>Now everything is jammed into three type sizes and one image size, with the repetition ad nauseum of oversized avatars in rounded corners (rounded corners?? hey, welcome to 1994).</p>
<p>If fact the utter ugliness and confusion of the profile page is why I&#8217;ve hardly posted anything since the change. Today I actually considered using all caps for the more important posts, just so they&#8217;ll stand out above the general visual racket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ridgley</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/03/19/facebook-users-hate-twitter-style-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-165755</link>
		<dc:creator>Ridgley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=14078#comment-165755</guid>
		<description>If we wanted to be part of a website like twitter, we would have joined twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we wanted to be part of a website like twitter, we would have joined twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
