<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google responds to AP controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2009/04/08/google-responds-to-ap-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/04/08/google-responds-to-ap-controversy/</link>
	<description>Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger Milson</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/04/08/google-responds-to-ap-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-169681</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Milson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/04/08/google-responds-to-ap-controversy/#comment-169681</guid>
		<description>Ofcourse Google benefits newspapers -- any news site is going be at least 30% Google traffic -- that&#039;s money for jam as far as the publishers are concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ofcourse Google benefits newspapers &#8212; any news site is going be at least 30% Google traffic &#8212; that&#8217;s money for jam as far as the publishers are concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
