<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter: &#8220;We are not for sale&#8221; &#8211; So back off, Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2009/05/07/twitter-we-are-not-for-sale-so-back-off-apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/05/07/twitter-we-are-not-for-sale-so-back-off-apple/</link>
	<description>Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:38:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Keane</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/07/twitter-we-are-not-for-sale-so-back-off-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-177501</link>
		<dc:creator>James Keane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=15731#comment-177501</guid>
		<description>Prediction, in 12 months time the folks at Twitter will be kicking themselves for not selling when they could. With fads, you&#039;ve got to make money when you can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prediction, in 12 months time the folks at Twitter will be kicking themselves for not selling when they could. With fads, you&#8217;ve got to make money when you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Landry</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/07/twitter-we-are-not-for-sale-so-back-off-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-177486</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Landry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=15731#comment-177486</guid>
		<description>Why would Apple need to &quot;back off&quot; ? ... they were never interested in Twitter in the first place.

So please change the headline... It doesn&#039;t make sense when you know Apple could care less about Twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would Apple need to &#8220;back off&#8221; ? &#8230; they were never interested in Twitter in the first place.</p>
<p>So please change the headline&#8230; It doesn&#8217;t make sense when you know Apple could care less about Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/07/twitter-we-are-not-for-sale-so-back-off-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-177433</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 14:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=15731#comment-177433</guid>
		<description>&quot;not a fan of Apple, its products, or methodology&quot;

Heh.

Ahh, if only the tech blogs had a clue when they wrote stuff like this :)

Yellow blogs for all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;not a fan of Apple, its products, or methodology&#8221;</p>
<p>Heh.</p>
<p>Ahh, if only the tech blogs had a clue when they wrote stuff like this :)</p>
<p>Yellow blogs for all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
