<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia quote hoax has newspapers backtracking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2009/05/07/wikipedia-quote-hoax-has-newspapers-backtracking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/07/wikipedia-quote-hoax-has-newspapers-backtracking/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lister</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/07/wikipedia-quote-hoax-has-newspapers-backtracking/comment-page-1/#comment-177514</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 20:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=15749#comment-177514</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s worth remembering that -- in theory at least -- every statement on Wikipedia is supposed to be accompanied by a reference to an outside source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s worth remembering that &#8212; in theory at least &#8212; every statement on Wikipedia is supposed to be accompanied by a reference to an outside source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Pospisil</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/07/wikipedia-quote-hoax-has-newspapers-backtracking/comment-page-1/#comment-177504</link>
		<dc:creator>John Pospisil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=15749#comment-177504</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m very surprised that sites like the Guardian, The Independent and the BBC got caught out, especially since a quick Google search could established whether there were any more authoritative sources for the quote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very surprised that sites like the Guardian, The Independent and the BBC got caught out, especially since a quick Google search could established whether there were any more authoritative sources for the quote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ncaissie</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/07/wikipedia-quote-hoax-has-newspapers-backtracking/comment-page-1/#comment-177485</link>
		<dc:creator>ncaissie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=15749#comment-177485</guid>
		<description>Is that where you get your game reviews?

LOL just kidding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that where you get your game reviews?</p>
<p>LOL just kidding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

