<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rupert Murdoch plans to charge you to read his online newspapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2009/05/09/rupert-murdoch-plans-to-charge-you-to-read-his-online-newspapers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/09/rupert-murdoch-plans-to-charge-you-to-read-his-online-newspapers/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aquaadverse</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/09/rupert-murdoch-plans-to-charge-you-to-read-his-online-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-178232</link>
		<dc:creator>Aquaadverse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 23:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=15805#comment-178232</guid>
		<description>Most of the on line premium schemes either died or went free. 

 It&#039;s difficult to see a general newspaper being able to make it work.  You can build a homepage to tweak your own sources and interests far better than a traditional source.

 This charging for Internet access to content was fought and decided almost a decade ago. Someone needs to clue Murdoch all he will accomplish is driving eyeballs away from his websites and net even lower profits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the on line premium schemes either died or went free. </p>
<p> It&#8217;s difficult to see a general newspaper being able to make it work.  You can build a homepage to tweak your own sources and interests far better than a traditional source.</p>
<p> This charging for Internet access to content was fought and decided almost a decade ago. Someone needs to clue Murdoch all he will accomplish is driving eyeballs away from his websites and net even lower profits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/09/rupert-murdoch-plans-to-charge-you-to-read-his-online-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-178191</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 19:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=15805#comment-178191</guid>
		<description>Can he nit Google (or check his own paper&#039;s reports) what happened when NYT tried the same thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can he nit Google (or check his own paper&#8217;s reports) what happened when NYT tried the same thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

