<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: British Internet firms refuse to ban illegal filesharers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2009/05/12/british-internet-firms-refuse-to-ban-illegal-filesharers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/12/british-internet-firms-refuse-to-ban-illegal-filesharers/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnJ</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/12/british-internet-firms-refuse-to-ban-illegal-filesharers/comment-page-1/#comment-179366</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/12/british-internet-firms-refuse-to-ban-illegal-filesharers/#comment-179366</guid>
		<description>That the trade group still has &quot;Phonographic&quot; in their name tells you how outdated they are when it comes to tech.  And I think it&#039;s funny that they want ISPs to cut their own revenue stream (and essentially give said revenue to their competitors) because they think, but cannot necessarily prove an infraction.

Adapt or die.  And they aren&#039;t adapting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That the trade group still has &#8220;Phonographic&#8221; in their name tells you how outdated they are when it comes to tech.  And I think it&#8217;s funny that they want ISPs to cut their own revenue stream (and essentially give said revenue to their competitors) because they think, but cannot necessarily prove an infraction.</p>
<p>Adapt or die.  And they aren&#8217;t adapting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ncaissie</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/12/british-internet-firms-refuse-to-ban-illegal-filesharers/comment-page-1/#comment-178920</link>
		<dc:creator>ncaissie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/12/british-internet-firms-refuse-to-ban-illegal-filesharers/#comment-178920</guid>
		<description>What a load of crap.
It is not the ISPs job to police the net.
I would simply get a new ISP if they did that to me.
There are many ISPs to choose from. If all else fails there are plenty of wireless access around my place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a load of crap.<br />
It is not the ISPs job to police the net.<br />
I would simply get a new ISP if they did that to me.<br />
There are many ISPs to choose from. If all else fails there are plenty of wireless access around my place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

