<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New HDMI 1.4 spec could lead to consumer confusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/</link>
	<description>Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:25:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-236774</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/#comment-236774</guid>
		<description>Connector size for TV&#039;s is exactly the same.  1.4 is fully backward compatible. Like Exclamation point said , the specification offers an additional size option for mobile devices and automotive uses. 1.4 will work with old devices!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Connector size for TV&#8217;s is exactly the same.  1.4 is fully backward compatible. Like Exclamation point said , the specification offers an additional size option for mobile devices and automotive uses. 1.4 will work with old devices!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exclamation Point</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-236689</link>
		<dc:creator>Exclamation Point</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/#comment-236689</guid>
		<description>@David Hutchison
This article is somewhat old.  Your answer is &quot;yes&quot;.  HDMI V1.4 cables are fully backwards compatible with HDMI V1.3 inputs.  glow was confused.  The V1.4 spec adds a smaller connector as an option so that cell phones or other small devices can use HDMI.  You would need to purchase a special cable to get the smaller connector.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David Hutchison<br />
This article is somewhat old.  Your answer is &#8220;yes&#8221;.  HDMI V1.4 cables are fully backwards compatible with HDMI V1.3 inputs.  glow was confused.  The V1.4 spec adds a smaller connector as an option so that cell phones or other small devices can use HDMI.  You would need to purchase a special cable to get the smaller connector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hutchinson</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-235812</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hutchinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/#comment-235812</guid>
		<description>Will 1.4 fit into the 1.3 input???? Yes or No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will 1.4 fit into the 1.3 input???? Yes or No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: disques durs</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-211202</link>
		<dc:creator>disques durs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/#comment-211202</guid>
		<description>A new HDMI standard 1.4 is pretty excellent, since it has an integrated Ethernet channel and 4K resolution images. It seems high-speed bi-directional communication. I also will add an Audio Return Channel to enable upstream audio connections via the HDMI cable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new HDMI standard 1.4 is pretty excellent, since it has an integrated Ethernet channel and 4K resolution images. It seems high-speed bi-directional communication. I also will add an Audio Return Channel to enable upstream audio connections via the HDMI cable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glow</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-186158</link>
		<dc:creator>glow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/#comment-186158</guid>
		<description>@Richard:
&quot;I think there’s some confusion here. Keep in mind that just like 1.2 -&gt; 1.3, this is just setting standardization for new functionality - in the same cable type - with complete backward compatibility.&quot;

This is incorrect. There is essentially no backward compatibility due to the new (smaller) connector. *Perhaps* an adaptor will allow such compatibility. Either way, this will likely push the new 3D standard (to be established this year) to utilize 1.4, which means that all current equipment will likely be obsolete in a major way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard:<br />
&#8220;I think there’s some confusion here. Keep in mind that just like 1.2 -&gt; 1.3, this is just setting standardization for new functionality &#8211; in the same cable type &#8211; with complete backward compatibility.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is incorrect. There is essentially no backward compatibility due to the new (smaller) connector. *Perhaps* an adaptor will allow such compatibility. Either way, this will likely push the new 3D standard (to be established this year) to utilize 1.4, which means that all current equipment will likely be obsolete in a major way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-185178</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/#comment-185178</guid>
		<description>I think there&#039;s some confusion here.  Keep in mind that just like 1.2 -&gt; 1.3, this is just setting standardization for new functionality - in the same cable type - with complete backward compatibility.  A 1.4 compliant cable will work with a 1.3 system, and components can be mixed and matched between revisions with no real penalty.  For example, if you get a new 3d blu-ray player in a year that uses 1.4, you can still use your existing 1.3 cable, existing 1.3 tv, etc., you just won&#039;t be able to use the new features (i.e., 3d).  If you WANT to add the 3d support, feel free to buy a new TV.  How is having more options (while keeping those options completely backward compatible) a bad thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s some confusion here.  Keep in mind that just like 1.2 -&gt; 1.3, this is just setting standardization for new functionality &#8211; in the same cable type &#8211; with complete backward compatibility.  A 1.4 compliant cable will work with a 1.3 system, and components can be mixed and matched between revisions with no real penalty.  For example, if you get a new 3d blu-ray player in a year that uses 1.4, you can still use your existing 1.3 cable, existing 1.3 tv, etc., you just won&#8217;t be able to use the new features (i.e., 3d).  If you WANT to add the 3d support, feel free to buy a new TV.  How is having more options (while keeping those options completely backward compatible) a bad thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NeilPeart</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-184499</link>
		<dc:creator>NeilPeart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/#comment-184499</guid>
		<description>&quot;I feel like I may be left in the dust of new Blu-ray players, gaming systems and audio equipment because I have 1.3 connections instead of 1.4.  Some day electronics companies are going to have to realize we aren’t all made of money.&quot;

Sean, some day consumers have to realize that you don&#039;t need to upgrade every time a new little feature comes out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I feel like I may be left in the dust of new Blu-ray players, gaming systems and audio equipment because I have 1.3 connections instead of 1.4.  Some day electronics companies are going to have to realize we aren’t all made of money.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sean, some day consumers have to realize that you don&#8217;t need to upgrade every time a new little feature comes out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thisbymaster</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-184372</link>
		<dc:creator>thisbymaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/#comment-184372</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I don&#039;t care about 1.4 because my TV, blue-ray and computer don&#039;t support it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I don&#8217;t care about 1.4 because my TV, blue-ray and computer don&#8217;t support it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmangstar564</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-184370</link>
		<dc:creator>dmangstar564</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/#comment-184370</guid>
		<description>Ummmm....why aren&#039;t we just using optical fiber wire for everything? TOSHLINK is still one of the fastest connections around? seriously whats the point of 19 freaking pins? It made sense way back when...but even a 2 I/O fiber connection can do 500Mb/s which is more then a 40Mb/s bluray would ever need. TMDS is outdated technology that should be replaced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummmm&#8230;.why aren&#8217;t we just using optical fiber wire for everything? TOSHLINK is still one of the fastest connections around? seriously whats the point of 19 freaking pins? It made sense way back when&#8230;but even a 2 I/O fiber connection can do 500Mb/s which is more then a 40Mb/s bluray would ever need. TMDS is outdated technology that should be replaced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AC</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-184237</link>
		<dc:creator>AC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/05/30/new-hdmi-14-spec-could-lead-to-consumer-confusion/#comment-184237</guid>
		<description>Just wait another few years; they&#039;ll bring out another &#039;standard&#039; that lacks backward compatibility.  At this point, if it doesn&#039;t have several full resolution HDTV component A/V connections, I won&#039;t even consider buying it.  HDMI is worthless, no matter what connector it&#039;s using this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wait another few years; they&#8217;ll bring out another &#8217;standard&#8217; that lacks backward compatibility.  At this point, if it doesn&#8217;t have several full resolution HDTV component A/V connections, I won&#8217;t even consider buying it.  HDMI is worthless, no matter what connector it&#8217;s using this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
