<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google aims at display ad market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2009/06/14/google-aims-at-display-ad-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/06/14/google-aims-at-display-ad-market/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Div Bhansali</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/06/14/google-aims-at-display-ad-market/comment-page-1/#comment-188167</link>
		<dc:creator>Div Bhansali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=17036#comment-188167</guid>
		<description>Google certainly has the resources to make an impact in the display market, but they&#039;ve been talking about their commitment for years and their product hasn&#039;t really caught on. A couple of points on that:

- Google&#039;s free Ad Builder sounds like a nice touch, but AdReady already offers a better tool, and BidPlace SB (full disclosure: I work on this product) will be offering a much more comprehensive, easy-to-use Banner Builder product next month.
- Google Display will charge over the client&#039;s daily budget cap when extra impressions are available. BidPlace SB and other products cap the client&#039;s spend at the dollar amount that the client has indicated. No billing surprises - what a concept!
- Google reaches a smaller portion of the Internet population than BidPlace SB, which is powered by the industry-leading Advertising.com network.

In short, there are a number of significant areas where Google&#039;s display product has historically fallen short relative to Bidplace SB and other competitors. Based on the &quot;new&quot; info Google has released, it appears that gap remains, and perhaps helps to explain the distance between Google&#039;s ambitions in this space and their current market share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google certainly has the resources to make an impact in the display market, but they&#8217;ve been talking about their commitment for years and their product hasn&#8217;t really caught on. A couple of points on that:</p>
<p>- Google&#8217;s free Ad Builder sounds like a nice touch, but AdReady already offers a better tool, and BidPlace SB (full disclosure: I work on this product) will be offering a much more comprehensive, easy-to-use Banner Builder product next month.<br />
- Google Display will charge over the client&#8217;s daily budget cap when extra impressions are available. BidPlace SB and other products cap the client&#8217;s spend at the dollar amount that the client has indicated. No billing surprises &#8211; what a concept!<br />
- Google reaches a smaller portion of the Internet population than BidPlace SB, which is powered by the industry-leading Advertising.com network.</p>
<p>In short, there are a number of significant areas where Google&#8217;s display product has historically fallen short relative to Bidplace SB and other competitors. Based on the &#8220;new&#8221; info Google has released, it appears that gap remains, and perhaps helps to explain the distance between Google&#8217;s ambitions in this space and their current market share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Keane</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/06/14/google-aims-at-display-ad-market/comment-page-1/#comment-187361</link>
		<dc:creator>James Keane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=17036#comment-187361</guid>
		<description>Selling display ads is a completely different process to selling search advertising. As Jason points out, it&#039;s all about wining and dining, and doing deals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Selling display ads is a completely different process to selling search advertising. As Jason points out, it&#8217;s all about wining and dining, and doing deals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Brown</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/06/14/google-aims-at-display-ad-market/comment-page-1/#comment-187333</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=17036#comment-187333</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t help thinking that sometimes Google needs to stop being an algorithm and to start developing real relationships with people. I think that&#039;s been the biggest problem it&#039;s had with both managing publishers and getting clients. While dealing with a machine is fine for search advertising, selling display advertising is a different ball game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t help thinking that sometimes Google needs to stop being an algorithm and to start developing real relationships with people. I think that&#8217;s been the biggest problem it&#8217;s had with both managing publishers and getting clients. While dealing with a machine is fine for search advertising, selling display advertising is a different ball game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

