<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft brags that Bing is superior to Google with TV ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2009/06/14/microsoft-brags-that-bing-is-superior-to-google-with-tv-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/06/14/microsoft-brags-that-bing-is-superior-to-google-with-tv-ads/</link>
	<description>Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:15:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/06/14/microsoft-brags-that-bing-is-superior-to-google-with-tv-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-187262</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 07:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/06/14/microsoft-brags-that-bing-is-superior-to-google-with-tv-ads/#comment-187262</guid>
		<description>I find that bing really falls flat on its face in the place it matters most; relevence. It&#039;s strange because that seems to be the most heavily advertised point! I really like some features that bing includes, but it&#039;s the same old same old when it comes to giving me the results I actually want (fails miserably - well maybe not quite that much).

Sorry Microsoft. I&#039;ll stay with Google for now, but will consider Wolfram Alpha for the kind of searches it excels at. Just wish it had more up-to-date data...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that bing really falls flat on its face in the place it matters most; relevence. It&#8217;s strange because that seems to be the most heavily advertised point! I really like some features that bing includes, but it&#8217;s the same old same old when it comes to giving me the results I actually want (fails miserably &#8211; well maybe not quite that much).</p>
<p>Sorry Microsoft. I&#8217;ll stay with Google for now, but will consider Wolfram Alpha for the kind of searches it excels at. Just wish it had more up-to-date data&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
