<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Collecta real-time search: So fast it hurts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2009/06/19/collecta-real-time-search-so-fast-it-hurts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/06/19/collecta-real-time-search-so-fast-it-hurts/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tobias</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/06/19/collecta-real-time-search-so-fast-it-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-188718</link>
		<dc:creator>tobias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 05:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/06/19/collecta-real-time-search-so-fast-it-hurts/#comment-188718</guid>
		<description>hey SixStorm, i work at OneRiot so i&#039;d argue with realtime search being &quot;completely useless&quot; ;-) Industry figures show that 20-40% of searches display some intent that would be best served by results from the realtime web (e.g. when you are trying to find out what&#039;s going on right now concerning Iran). We&#039;re doing a lot of work on realtime web ranking algorithms to get the most relevant realtime results to you fast (http://blog.oneriot.com/content/2009/06/oneriot-pulse-rank) but there&#039;s also huge value in the realtime &quot;firehose&quot; approach of Collecta. It&#039;s a fast-moving and innovative space, so keep watching :) Tobias @ OneRiot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey SixStorm, i work at OneRiot so i&#8217;d argue with realtime search being &#8220;completely useless&#8221; ;-) Industry figures show that 20-40% of searches display some intent that would be best served by results from the realtime web (e.g. when you are trying to find out what&#8217;s going on right now concerning Iran). We&#8217;re doing a lot of work on realtime web ranking algorithms to get the most relevant realtime results to you fast (<a href="http://blog.oneriot.com/content/2009/06/oneriot-pulse-rank" rel="nofollow">http://blog.oneriot.com/content/2009/06/oneriot-pulse-rank</a>) but there&#8217;s also huge value in the realtime &#8220;firehose&#8221; approach of Collecta. It&#8217;s a fast-moving and innovative space, so keep watching :) Tobias @ OneRiot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sixstorm</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/06/19/collecta-real-time-search-so-fast-it-hurts/comment-page-1/#comment-188440</link>
		<dc:creator>sixstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/06/19/collecta-real-time-search-so-fast-it-hurts/#comment-188440</guid>
		<description>Everyone now is trying to launch a search engine whose name gonna be forgotten within a week. Someone remember Cuil? The only search engine that may compete Google in a mid or long-term period is Bing. Period.

Yeah real-time results are great, but they are totally irrelevant. Searching takes 2 minutes and all you finally get is some totally stupid results that are most of the time related to twitter. Completely useless. Traditional search engines are the way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone now is trying to launch a search engine whose name gonna be forgotten within a week. Someone remember Cuil? The only search engine that may compete Google in a mid or long-term period is Bing. Period.</p>
<p>Yeah real-time results are great, but they are totally irrelevant. Searching takes 2 minutes and all you finally get is some totally stupid results that are most of the time related to twitter. Completely useless. Traditional search engines are the way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

