<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Einstein 3 threaten citizen privacy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2009/07/04/does-einstein-3-threaten-citizen-privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/07/04/does-einstein-3-threaten-citizen-privacy/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Wolf</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/07/04/does-einstein-3-threaten-citizen-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-240084</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=17712#comment-240084</guid>
		<description>U.S. Government despite promises that Einstein 3 would not invade private email and other private communications in its fight against terrorists has habitually broken those promises in the past (NSA Spying) on private electronic communications that don’t involve terrorism and to arrest U.S. Citizens for alleged ordinary crimes. 

Neither Congress nor the courts—determined what warrant-less NSA electronic surveillance under Bush II could be used by police or introduced into court by U.S. Government to prosecute Citizens and foreign businesses doing business in America. It appears NSA can share its electronic-domestic-spying with countless U.S. police agencies; including government contracted companies and private individuals that have security clearances to facilitate criminal and civil prosecutions that may include forfeiture of Americans’ property—-to keep part of the assets. Police too easily can take an innocent person’s “wiretapped” hastily written email, fax or phone call out of context to allege a crime or violation was committed.

There are over 200 U.S. laws and violations mentioned in the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 and the Patriot Act that can subject property to civil asset forfeiture.” Under federal civil forfeiture laws, a person or business need not be charged with a crime for government to forfeit their property. Government is required only to show “A preponderance of Evidence” to civilly forfeit assets. Rep. Henry Hyde’s bill HR 1658 passed, the “Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000” and effectively eliminated the “statue of limitations” for Government Civil Asset Forfeiture. The statute now runs five years from when police allege they “learned” that an asset became subject to forfeiture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. Government despite promises that Einstein 3 would not invade private email and other private communications in its fight against terrorists has habitually broken those promises in the past (NSA Spying) on private electronic communications that don’t involve terrorism and to arrest U.S. Citizens for alleged ordinary crimes. </p>
<p>Neither Congress nor the courts—determined what warrant-less NSA electronic surveillance under Bush II could be used by police or introduced into court by U.S. Government to prosecute Citizens and foreign businesses doing business in America. It appears NSA can share its electronic-domestic-spying with countless U.S. police agencies; including government contracted companies and private individuals that have security clearances to facilitate criminal and civil prosecutions that may include forfeiture of Americans’ property—-to keep part of the assets. Police too easily can take an innocent person’s “wiretapped” hastily written email, fax or phone call out of context to allege a crime or violation was committed.</p>
<p>There are over 200 U.S. laws and violations mentioned in the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 and the Patriot Act that can subject property to civil asset forfeiture.” Under federal civil forfeiture laws, a person or business need not be charged with a crime for government to forfeit their property. Government is required only to show “A preponderance of Evidence” to civilly forfeit assets. Rep. Henry Hyde’s bill HR 1658 passed, the “Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000” and effectively eliminated the “statue of limitations” for Government Civil Asset Forfeiture. The statute now runs five years from when police allege they “learned” that an asset became subject to forfeiture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

