TECH.BLORGE.com
VISTA.BLORGE.com
MAC.BLORGE.com
GAMER.BLORGE.com

September 13, 2009 |

High-tech advice for newspaper survival on the Web

By Michael W. Jones





High-tech advice for newspaper survival on the WebA national association of newspapers asked for advice on how America’s newspapers could stop hemorrhaging money on the web and received answers from some unexpected sources.

The Newspaper Association of America, a nonprofit organization representing the $47 billion newspaper industry and more than 2,000 newspapers in the U.S. and Canada, asked for advice from the high-tech industry on how they could make money on the Web at a time when many newspapers are going bankrupt trying to keep their print editions alive. In return, they received advice from large companies like Google and Microsoft as well as smaller companies with news for profit ideas, according to an AP article.

The problem has received a lot more industry attention than the possible solutions. Alan Mutter a former editor and current industry consultant, says “This was supposed to be the year that newspapers started charging for online content. Based on what I’ve seen, I don’t get any sense that there is unanimity about charging or that they would know how to go about doing it.”

Google, the company some people blame for many of the problems of online newspapers, was not at all shy about what it sees as the solution. Their response reads, in part, “Google believes that an open Web benefits all users and publishers. However, `open’ need not mean free.” It goes on to suggest that a system like its own Google Checkout could be used to allow readers to access for-pay news from many paid on-line sources, in both subscription sites and micropayment sites, without having to continually enter the authentication credentials on different sites to access the news.

A much smaller startup based at the University of Missouri has a similar idea, involving advertising-supported news and subscriptions. Like Google, however, CircLabs is proposing that the newspapers make use of its proprietary system to take the news behind a simpler for-pay firewall. Both proposals offer an existing service from which the proposer will make a profit. Neither are particularly innovative. Both are self-serving.

Nor do they address the real problem, which is a lack of consensus and commitment by newspapers to finally take action to charge for news content on line. Free internet news is such a fact of life today that any action taken by newspapers to charge for Web news must be a concerted action by all news organizations. There is no proof that any solution is viewed favorably by all the players, or even that all the players have the determination necessary to make such a difficult move. Until truly unified action is possible, probably supported by technical innovation, nothing will come of for-pay news on the internet.

Related:

  • Stop the press: newspaper ad revenues plummet yet again
  • Five iPhone launch day survival tips
  • Hearst plans a “Kindle” for newspapers
  • Facebook racism from the Isle of Man
  • Online advertisers cinch up the belts, survival of the fittest rules the day




  • Sign up for the BLORGE daily email newsletter

    4 Responses to “High-tech advice for newspaper survival on the Web”

    1. mark van patten:

      NAA is a membership organization and therefore does not represent the newspaper industry and is funded almost entirely by large chain newspaper groups.

      Many small market, suburban market and most weeklies are not members.

    2. Martin Langeveld:

      You mischaracterize Circulate; it’s not a “for-pay firewall.” Folks interested in what Circulate really is can check our website, http://www.CircLabs.com.

      Martin Langeveld
      Executive V. P.
      CircLabs Inc.

    3. Aquaadverse:

      It didn’t work when the sources of information were much smaller and the Web was new to mass adoption. You saw AOL basically bleed subscribers with a lot of specialty areas with long time users.
      The more successful sites have dynamic comments and interaction. If the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and large periodicals can’t get it done……
      The thing is, I check in on papers where I previously lived fairly often, something I wouldn’t do if they became pay sites. I could easily hit television station sites who still have their old media advertising revenue in place plus the news broadcasts streaming and many with them archived for on demand for free.
      Pretty hard to understand if you already can’t get people to subscribe to expanded content for a pittance how this would work.

    4. DavidB:

      Any organization that tries to take news behind a pay wall is just signing its own death warrant.

    Leave a Reply:

    Copyright © 2008 Engaging and compelling blogs that entertain and inform