<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ralph Lauren admits to shoddy Photoshop job despite its DMCA takedown letter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2009/10/11/ralph-lauren-admits-to-shoddy-photoshop-job-despite-its-dmca-takedown-letter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/10/11/ralph-lauren-admits-to-shoddy-photoshop-job-despite-its-dmca-takedown-letter/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreedomLover</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/10/11/ralph-lauren-admits-to-shoddy-photoshop-job-despite-its-dmca-takedown-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-218247</link>
		<dc:creator>FreedomLover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/10/11/ralph-lauren-admits-to-shoddy-photoshop-job-despite-its-dmca-takedown-letter/#comment-218247</guid>
		<description>Actually, if you read the law, these guys are permitted by the Fair Use provisions of the US Copyright laws to post these pictures. They are not using the photos for commercial gain, they did not claim ownership of these photos, all well legal under Fair Use.

Also, these guys did not bypass any digital protection schemes, and therefore did not even violate the DCMA. Ralph Lauren is doing nothing less than a mafia-style shakedown, and I&#039;m glad the other company is fighting back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, if you read the law, these guys are permitted by the Fair Use provisions of the US Copyright laws to post these pictures. They are not using the photos for commercial gain, they did not claim ownership of these photos, all well legal under Fair Use.</p>
<p>Also, these guys did not bypass any digital protection schemes, and therefore did not even violate the DCMA. Ralph Lauren is doing nothing less than a mafia-style shakedown, and I&#8217;m glad the other company is fighting back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/10/11/ralph-lauren-admits-to-shoddy-photoshop-job-despite-its-dmca-takedown-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-217920</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/10/11/ralph-lauren-admits-to-shoddy-photoshop-job-despite-its-dmca-takedown-letter/#comment-217920</guid>
		<description>You have to wonder, why do we rarely ever hear stories of companies being penalized for their false DMCA takedowns? These are going to continue until companies realize it is just as illegal to send a fraudulent takedown notice as it is to illegal post copyrighted content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to wonder, why do we rarely ever hear stories of companies being penalized for their false DMCA takedowns? These are going to continue until companies realize it is just as illegal to send a fraudulent takedown notice as it is to illegal post copyrighted content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

