<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Six charged with insider trading involving Google, Intel and IBM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2009/10/19/six-charged-with-insider-trading-involving-google-intel-and-ibm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/10/19/six-charged-with-insider-trading-involving-google-intel-and-ibm/</link>
	<description>Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:23:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Ferro</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/10/19/six-charged-with-insider-trading-involving-google-intel-and-ibm/comment-page-1/#comment-224490</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Ferro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/10/19/six-charged-with-insider-trading-involving-google-intel-and-ibm/#comment-224490</guid>
		<description>I agree that hedge fund companies have been shady front practices for insider trading in the past but proponents have always argued big companies like Galleon proved otherwise for the majority.
With big companies like Galleon and New Castle pt. implicated in insider trading, the whole concept is quickly coming under question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that hedge fund companies have been shady front practices for insider trading in the past but proponents have always argued big companies like Galleon proved otherwise for the majority.<br />
With big companies like Galleon and New Castle pt. implicated in insider trading, the whole concept is quickly coming under question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/10/19/six-charged-with-insider-trading-involving-google-intel-and-ibm/comment-page-1/#comment-220189</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/Structure: /2009/10/19/six-charged-with-insider-trading-involving-google-intel-and-ibm/#comment-220189</guid>
		<description>Quickly? Its been that way for years, where ya been?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quickly? Its been that way for years, where ya been?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
